A Ban on Mail Order Chicks? - Modern Farmer

A Ban on Mail Order Chicks?

New York legislators are considering a bill that would prohibit shipping live animals within the state.

A new bill proposes banning mail order chicks in New York.
Photography by Stephanie Frey via Shutterstock

There are a lot of ways to look forward to a long winter’s end. For some people, it’s the arrival of tulips and daffodils. For others, it’s the song of nesting birds. But for many, there’s only one kind of spring fever they know—baby chick season. The United States Postal Service has been shipping chicks through the mail since 1918 and, until last summer, there’s only ever been a small contingent of people speaking out against it. Generally speaking, people either don’t know that hundreds of thousands of chicks are shipped every year to farms and individuals through the USPS or they’re the ones ordering them.

That changed when an article from the Portland Press Herald went viral in August 2020 and detailed how at least 4,800 chicks had died on the way to farms in Maine. Service cuts and delays at the USPS were largely blamed, but the issue of whether live animals should be shipped at all started attracting the attention of lawmakers. Earlier this month, Linda Rosenthal, a New York State assembly member from Manhattan, introduced a bill that would end the shipment of any live animals by mail into or within her state. In addition to day-old poultry, the bill would also impact the reptile trade, which frequently relies on the mail to move animals. 

In the current version of the bill, each animal shipped would be counted as a separate offense—each punishable by a civil penalty of up to $1,000. That bill was referred to the agriculture committee where it seems unlikely to make much progress as written. This is because the USPS is a federal agency regulated by the constitution and, therefore, state bans can’t override federal law, says Kimberly Frum, a postal service spokesperson. 

Since news of  the bill started spreading through farming, hatchery and backyard chicken committees, lawmakers have heard from many businesses and individuals who are concerned about how a ban on shipping chicks could affect them. Catherine Raleigh-Boylan, a co-owner of Raleigh’s Poultry Farm in Kings Park, New York, says not having access to day-old chicks would affect her business drastically.

“It wouldn’t be cost effective at all,” she tells Modern Farmer. Raleigh-Boylan says that, even in 2020, she’s never had an issue with shipments from the post office to her farm—which was started by her parents and has been ordering chicks by mail for 60 years. “You might lose one or two out of two-hundred. The rest are always healthy,” she says.

While large, vertically integrated companies such as Tyson Foods have their own hatcheries and truck chicks between them and the farms that raise poultry for meat, most small farmers rely on getting multiple shipments of chicks in the mail throughout the year. Many individuals who raise chickens choose to buy them from local farm stores rather than through the mail, but the vast majority of those farm stores also get their chicks in large shipments through the USPS. Of course, those who don’t live close enough to a hatchery to pick up chicks in person could always order fertilized hatching eggs through the mail,  but this would require buying an incubator and—if the owner wanted to vaccinate their chicks—doing it themselves despite the fact that most vaccines are only sold in batches between 500 and 10,000 doses. 

Many farmers have a similar story to that of Raleigh-Boylan. John Metzer, the owner of Metzer Farms, a California hatchery, says he thinks the post office does a good job overall. “But, sometimes, somebody makes a mistake and puts the chicks on the wrong truck or forgets to take it off. It’s a human error thing,” says Metzer, who is also a board member of a group of hatchery owners called the Bird Shippers of America. Industry wisdom dictates that chicks are okay as long as they arrive at their final destination within 72 hours of their hatch date. Chicks absorb the yolk in their egg before hatching, which gives them enough nutrition that, in nature, they won’t starve to death while the rest of the hen’s clutch of eggs hatch; some always take longer than others. This is the basic principle that allows the mail order chick business to exist. Metzer says that 90 percent of his chicks get where they’re going within two days and the rest in three.

“The fact that they can not starve to death and die of dehydration in a 72-hour period does not make it humane,” says Karen Davis, founder of United Poultry Concerns, an animal rights organization that focuses on poultry. She raises the point that because hatchery chicks are incubated en masse—and do hatch at different times—a chick that’s part of the “Monday” group didn’t necessarily hatch on Monday morning. “Seventy-two hours from when? When they’re put in shipping boxes or when they’re taken to a truck?” she says. If they have to be shipped at all, Davis would like to see chicks reach their final destination within 24 hours of hatching, although she doesn’t see an easy way to enforce it. There doesn’t seem to be any scientific research on how far apart chicks actually hatch on average under a hen and, therefore, how long chicks usually go without food or water after hatching in nature. 

It’s clear that many farmers and backyard chicken keepers want the shipment of day-old chicks to continue. And, other than this summer, it’s not an issue that’s gotten a lot of attention even among the animal welfare community. “There’s so much to attend to as far as farmed animals are concerned,” Davis says. “You can go into a [factory farm] and videotape and document what’s going on there and show it on the internet, but you can’t really do that when the birds are in a cargo area of an airplane.” And other than dying on the way to their destinations, chicks don’t have a lot of ways to communicate how they feel about the experience of being shipped in the mail in a cardboard box. The wisdom thus far has seemed to be: As long as they arrive alive, the system is working. 

But even within the industry, not everyone agrees that shipping day-old chicks should continue as is. “I think it’s ridiculous I can buy light bulbs and get them overnighted from China, but I put a baby chick on a plane and then get told it will be two to three days and no guarantee on that,” says Tom Watkins, vice president of Murray McMurray hatchery in Iowa. He thinks there’s a real need for kind and compassionate animal transportation. “I care very much about the chicks. Things are not ideal. While even [in] the best of circumstances not every chick will make it, we need to give them a fighting chance,” he says.

The chick shipping season generally goes from February through October, months that—especially lately—are full of winter snowstorms or heat waves, both of which can be deadly to chicks. Either the chicks can die from overheating or freezing or because of postal delays that take the chicks far beyond the 72-hour period. In mid-February 2021, winter storms were so severe that the USPS actually suspended the shipment of all live animals from February 12 through February 16. Because of the dates, it may not have had much of an effect on chicks (they usually ship on Monday or Tuesday), but, generally speaking, if the post office isn’t shipping chicks, it doesn’t mean the chicks aren’t hatching. Commercial hatcheries may be able to slightly delay hatching with advanced notice, but they certainly don’t have the resources to care for all the surprise chicks. (Hatcheries also can’t hold on to them and ship them a week later since the USPS only accepts day-old and adult birds.) MyPetChicken, a hatchery popular with backyard keepers, announced it was suspending chick shipments for the week of February 15 and “would use as many as possible” as six-week-old birds or perhaps put them back into their breeding program.

The 4,800 chicks that died in Maine got a lot of press thanks to the way they fit into the narrative about USPS delays over the summer. Regular—and some might say predictable—losses from the weather or chicks that are too weak after a long delay between hatching and getting into a heated brooder easily cause more deaths every year. 

A farm store employee in the Pacific Northwest tells Modern Farmer that her store had an order of a few hundred chicks, hatched Tuesday, February 9 and set to arrive by Friday—before the USPS restriction on live animal shipment went into effect. Modern Farmer is not identifying the employee as she was not authorized to speak to the press about her job. The chicks got stuck on the way there because of the winter storm in the region. Between the delay and the long weekend, there’s no way that the chicks would make it to their final destination alive. “Other stores had non-arrival and delay notices, too,” she says. The number of chicks that don’t make it in time can add up quickly when multiplied across farm stores and personal orders throughout a weather-affected region.

She adds that February cold snaps are common and are why she never orders chicks this early. She also avoids even incubating them at home due to the risk of the power going out and the chicks’ heat source with it. “I’d prefer to see them start shipping in March when the temperatures don’t seem to be quite as extreme,” she says, adding that she wished more hatcheries had a policy of not shipping during weeks with a federal holiday. “Unfortunately, consumer demand drives us to purchase and ship them this early.” And since the pandemic started, that demand has skyrocketed.


Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

One thing readers need to be aware of is that parcel services (FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc.) are not allowed to transport live animals (not only chicks and reptiles but also honeybees) because they use cargo planes. US Mail is shipped by ground or on passenger flights. So if shipping of live chicks via US Mail is banned, farmers and farm supply stores will have to completely change how they obtain chicks, decreasing availability and likely significantly increasing prices.

2 years ago

I would also respond to Karen Davis: Yes, there is some stress for animals in transit. Yes, there is also stress for humans in transit. Should we completely stop traveling because of that? Should we completely disallow all transport of cats and dogs due to temporary stress(How about the yowling of a cat headed to the vet for its annual shots?)? Should we make traveling with our children illegal because they can’t decide whether they should or want to travel? As a 30 year farmer of cattle, hogs, chickens, turkeys and horses, I can say that farmers care deeply about… Read more »

jim purdy
2 years ago

I will direct this at Karen Davis; you have a good education and you seem to know quite a bit about airline shipping. I assume you have good knowledge about eggs, chickens and hens too. NOW, I suggest you would be a great asset to us chick growers/egg producers. With all your education and knowledge about these subjects would you consider becoming vocal leader for more efficient shipping of chicks? We need good, smart people to do this I need ‘day-old’ chicks that are off to a good start. Help me and the baby chicks out…..please

2 years ago

I live in SW Montana, and have successfully ordered and raised USPS-shipped chicks for 25 years. February- iffy for safe arrivals. March onwards? I might lose one per shipment, but I routinely expect and receive a box of healthy chicks that make it to adulthood. I deeply depend on being able to receive those chicks by mail. I live 50 miles from the nearest town, only 3 miles from the local post office. Many many of the smaller farming families in my area- a 100 mile radius, depend on those chicks for layers, and for meat birds. We’d be sunk… Read more »

2 years ago

This will not only affect Chicks if you look at the USPS 526 on shipment of live animals this also includes Honey bees and Honey bee queens that would be devastating to the honey bee industry also.

Natalie G.
1 year ago

MA, CT, RI, ME, VT, and NH are all connecting states to NY. You cannot access these states travelling from the west to the east without passing through NY. This bill would indirectly make it impossible to ship live animals to not one, but a total of seven (7) states. Does anyone else see that NY is attempting to cripple every farming community that encompasses New England?

P. Dinges
1 year ago

We should not mail any live beings. It’s wrong. Period.

Otis Needleman
2 years ago

I can see banning the Dixie Chicks, but not mailing live chicks.

Lisa Mellinger
2 years ago

I retired a USPS postal clerk in 2012. I worked as the dock expediter for over 15 years. I had first-hand knowledge of how the USPS trucked chickens, turkeys, ducks, pigeons, turtle doves, bees, crickets. Here Are The Live Animals You Can Send In The USPS mail. Day-old chickens (and other poultry like turkeys, duck and geese) Live honeybees and queen bees. Live scorpions. Live adult birds. Small cold-blooded animals, including: Baby alligators. Chameleons. Frogs. Lizards. Newts. Tadpoles and toads. Goldfish. Tropical fish. Worms. Leeches. Kokomo, Indiana received most of our poultry from Ft. Wayne, Indiana, 6 days a week,… Read more »

Mike N.
11 months ago

While I don’t disagree that more should be done to ensure safe mailings for animals, completely banning it would perhaps be even worse for animal welfare. Many of the chicks being mailed are raised by small producers or backyard farmers. Like the chickens I own, they are probably given much more space and allowed to free range. Surely the short trauma they possibly endure is vastly outweighed by the happier remainder of their lives. By making it difficult for small producers to obtain birds, it seems like this bill would end up causing more birds to be raised in factory… Read more »