Why is the USDA Buying $40 Million Worth of Pistachios?
The department is also making the largest seafood purchase in its history.
The USDA has long purchased food from American producers, but often, some types of products get precedence—such as dairy.
Last week, though, the USDA announced a different sort of mass purchase: the largest seafood purchase in the history of the department and a gigantic amount of pistachios.
The USDA’s purchasing typically serves two purposes: first, to buy crops and other products from farmers who are having trouble selling it, which provides income to them, and also to supply that food to food banks and other distribution programs for the food-insecure. Exactly which products are purchased by the USDA seems to vary based on several factors.
A USDA spokesperson, in reply to an inquiry, wrote in an email that the decision of what products and in what quantities to purchase is “determined by ongoing reviews of agricultural market conditions, requests from industry, demand from federal nutrition program participants and nutritional aspects of the products.” Those “requests from industry” seem important; we’ve seen the dairy industry repeatedly request huge purchases as demand for their products decreases, and local lawmakers will sometimes request purchases for their constituents, as happened with Gulf shrimp last summer.
In mid-April of 2021, lawmakers representing coastal Pacific regions requested that more Pacific seafood be purchased by the USDA. That request seems to have been answered with this new purchase, which is the largest-ever seafood purchase by the USDA. It includes Pacific-caught species such as rockfish, Pacific whiting, pollock, and sockeye salmon, along with more Gulf shrimp.
There’s also one eye-catching number in the press release announcing this purchase. While the announcement focuses on the seafood purchase, the single largest amount of money isn’t for a fish or crustacean; it’s for a crop grown almost exclusively in the deserts of inland California. This purchase announcement includes a whopping $40 million for pistachios, almost twice as much as any other purchase.
Pistachios have become a major crop in inland California, with strong export markets, high prices and lower water requirements than, say, almonds. Requiring less water is extremely valuable in the Central Valley, where water is scarce at the best of times and likely to hit extreme levels this year, thanks to a worse-than-usual rainy season. In fact, the past two years have set records for California pistachio output, and analysts see pistachio acreage rapidly growing into the foreseeable future.
This is a relatively new crop in this quantity; the first USDA purchase of pistachios was only in 2011. But production is absolutely booming: The USDA’s February report predicted an insane 42-percent increase over the previous year. In late 2020, the American Pistachio Growers organization itself said that it is “mounting a full-court press to market the expected one-billion-pound harvest that is now filling bins in processing facilities.”
The USDA spokesperson did not respond to a question on whether the American Pistachio Growers or anyone else had specifically requested that the USDA purchase pistachios, only saying that the USDA “proactively monitors market conditions to determine what products and volumes to purchase under the authority of Section 32.”
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Why is the USDA Buying $40 Million Worth of Pistachios?
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
May 17, 2021
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
So is this huge purchase of pistachios going to benefit the Resnicks more than anyone? They own huge amounts of crop land in California plus huge water rights so that they can grow almonds IN THE DESERT to export to China. I suspect the Resnicks who are coddled by politicians in this state will benefit the most since they are the largest growers of pistachios in the state. Follow the money.
So the government is choosing a winner, why not let the market decide. But wait maybe Nancy Pelloci has a nut farm, would make sense
Paper water and government handouts. A business built on nothing but corruption.
Can’t leave Iran out of this equation…second only to the US in pistachio production…
“…said that it is “mounting a full-court press to market the expected one-billion-pound harvest…”
What does court, and press have to do with the pistachio harvest, market, or the USDA’s massive purchase of the crop? Neither of these words, or subject matters were mentioned anywhere in the article, other than the quoted text.
Thanks!