Lawsuit Targeting Smelly Hog Feces Pits in North Carolina Moving Forward
A lawsuit that has it all: corruption, environmental destruction, and a giant pool of pig poop.
Lawsuit Targeting Smelly Hog Feces Pits in North Carolina Moving Forward
A lawsuit that has it all: corruption, environmental destruction, and a giant pool of pig poop.
The lawsuit, like the feces pits at its center, seems to get grosser and grosser the further you investigate. Here are the basics.
In 2014, a team of lawyers began crafting a lawsuit against pork producers by using an unexpected angle: that the producers were creating a public nuisance. That nuisance? A truly repulsive stink coming from North Carolina hog farms – specifically, from an “anerobic lagoon,” a type of waste-treatment method that involves – you guessed it – a “lagoon” full of animal waste. Since then, North Carolina Republicans, armed with donations from pork producers, have done their best to quash any hope this lawsuit has of succeeding.
But the lawsuit is beginning its early stages this week.
There are sensible and environmentally friendly ways to raise hogs and dispose of their manure, but it is incredibly difficult to do that when raising hogs in large numbers. Most hogs in the U.S. are raised in CAFOs – Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, often referred to as “factory farms” – so it’s no surprise it’s an issue here. In North Carolina, many hog operations use anaerobic lagoons to deal with hog manure; these are basically gigantic pits in which feces and urine just kind of sits until break it down, after which it is sprayed as fertilizer on crops.
These pits of feces are spectacularly awful in just about every way except financially. They leak toxic waste into the environment, they release methane gas steadily and without stop, and they smell insanely bad.
The North Carolina was filed on behalf of people living near Kinlaw Farm, which is technically independent but, as is the case with most livestock producers (especially chicken farmers), Kinlaw Farm has essentially no choice but to behave according to the wishes of its purchaser, Smithfield Foods. The lawsuit isn’t filed against the owners of Kinlaw farms, but against Murphy-Brown LLC, Smithfield’s hog production division, for which they raise their animals. The plaintiffs have called the anaerobic methods disgusting, disturbing, and unsafe, stating that it’s not even possible for them to relax outside in their yards due to the stench.
This lawsuit is up against some very difficult opponents. The public nuisance suit is an attempt to find a way to hold Smithfield accountable despite the fact that anaerobic lagoons are totally legal, but Smithfield has a great deal of lobbying power. IndyWeek has previously reported about some of the attempts to shut down lawsuits like this; a bill was drafted by Republican state politicians who have accepted significant donations from pork producers which would set a hard cap on the amount of money a person can get from a public nuisance suit. The governor of North Carolina vetoed the bill, which is sensible given how completely insane it is to protect giant corporations over individual citizens, but the state senate overruled the veto. (Other states have also passed ways to limit damages resulting from public nuisance suits, or otherwise stop local communities from putting in place tougher regulations).
The NC bill has an exemption for lawsuits already in progress, which is how the Kinlaw Farm suit is able to keep going, but new lawsuits will likely find that even filing is not worth the cost; the possible damages a lawsuit could secure are limited to the market value of the property. And the market value of the property, thanks to the stench, is not likely to be all that high. It’s kind of a catch-22, except instead of a rock and a hard place, it’s a pool filled with pig manure and a law designed to protect corporations.
Progress in the Kinlaw Farm lawsuit is ongoing; Emery Dalesio of the Associated Press has been reporting diligently. Last month, the defendants declared that it would be unfair for a jury to hear about the various non-disgusting and less invasive-to-the-neighbors methods used in other states to treat pig manure. This week, the judge presiding over the case said he would not send jurors to the farm in question to smell it. Interestingly, the pork producers were against this decision, but Dalesio noted that this could be because the producers had cleaned up the lagoon. (The plaintiff’s lawyers said this cleaning had never occurred before; it would be like inviting your mom to examine your room after shoving all your junk into a closet.)
A public nuisance suit might seem like a small issue, but this lawsuit gets at all kinds of issues inherent in the factory farming system: “independent” farmers with no control, rampant environmental destruction, corrupt politicians, rules written to favor corporations. It’s worth keeping an eye on.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
April 3, 2018
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
Yet, nothing is done to remove the smelly human fecal matter waste ponds and that awful smell. One operation actually feeds vast amounts of people and turns waste into fertilizer naturally. The other is a liability. Absurd lawsuit.