One of the Most Under-Used Resources in American Ag Is a Waste Product
Corn residue left after harvest should be a great source of winter grazing.
One of the Most Under-Used Resources in American Ag Is a Waste Product
Corn residue left after harvest should be a great source of winter grazing.
According to the University of Kentucky, each bushel of corn produced leaves about 50 pounds of…well, not corn.
This stuff is generally called corn residue, and it includes the stalk, leaves, cob, and some fallen ears of corn. Much of this residue is collected and disposed of; some farmers leave it to prevent erosion and inject some more nutrients into the soil over the winter. But there’s another option, and according to a new study, it’s a dramatically under-used one: let cattle graze this residue.
Morgan Grabau, at the American Society of Agronomy, took a closer look at the idea of cattle grazing on corn residue in a new study. This tactic is not commonly used; “Only 15 percent of the corn residue acres in the central US are grazed,” she says in the study’s press release. There are multiple reasons for that: some corn acreage isn’t close enough to cattle for it to make sense, for example. But there’s also a suspicion held by many farmers that it’s bad for yields, owing to the compaction the cattle will leave in the soil.
This turns out not to be the case, the study finds. The study looked at cattle grazing on corn residue both in winter, when the ground is very hard and resistant to compaction, and in spring, when rains have made it softer. They specifically examined acreage in a corn-soybean cycle, meaning soybeans would be planted following a corn crop.
The research found that there was some compaction, especially in the spring, but that farmers shouldn’t be concerned about it. The compaction was limited to exclusively the very top layer of the soil, and was not permanent. More importantly, the next crop of soybeans had, the press release says, “no problem” establishing seedlings in land the cattle had grazed.
Interestingly, the study did not find that there was no difference between land grazed by cattle and land not grazed by cattle—but the difference actually favors grazing. Yields actually increased in soybean fields that had a concentrated 15-day grazing period, which Grabau theorizes may have been due to the cattle removing excess corn residue. With less residue covering the ground, warmer spring weather could raise the temperature of the soil more efficiently, encouraging early growth.
The University of Kentucky has a little guide to grazing corn residue with cattle, saying that cattle are selective eaters and will opt for fallen ears of corn and tender leaves rather than the tough stalks. In addition, this corn residue isn’t tremendously nutritious, but some basic supplemental vitamins and minerals should even that out. And the benefits are obvious: less waste, cheap (or even free) feed for cattle during the winter when feed is at its priciest, and, apparently, improved yield for the next year’s soybean crop.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
January 8, 2021
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
You know absolutely nothing about agriculture and it shows. So many things wrong with this article and others the author has written.
I come from a Horticultural background but can see holes in this article big enough to swallow a combine. It is a study and like John says it shows. Do proper research before writing any article.