Washington State Supreme Court Rules Farmworkers Are Entitled to Overtime Pay
It’s the first ruling of its kind, and could be a model for other states.
There are many ways in which agricultural labor—despite being difficult, dangerous, and necessary—is treated differently from other types of labor.
One of those is in overtime pay, which, unlike in other industries, is not required federally. But last week, reports the Associated Press, the Washington Supreme Court (the state, not the city) ruled that there’s no reason not to require overtime pay for dairy farmworkers—thus making it required now.
Laws regarding overtime pay date back to the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which established many of the most important work protections still in use for Americans, including the prohibition of child labor, a federal minimum wage, and the requirement for time-and-a-half overtime pay. But there are exemptions for many of those laws: restaurant servers, for example, aren’t entitled to a minimum wage due to the practice of tipping.
Agricultural workers received several of these exemptions. The child labor rule has an exemption for agriculture, specifically for the children of farm owners. They’re also exempt from overtime laws, which for other workers require payment of 50 percent on top of their hourly wage for hours above 40 per week. Groups like Farmworker Justice note the racist roots of this exemption: the FLSA, in order to gain the support of Southern farmers and their representatives, included the exemption. At the time, the vast majority of farmworkers in the South were Black; today, the vast majority are Latinx.
The Washington Supreme Court ruled that there was no reason for state laws to contain this exemption. The ruling, which was decided 5-4, stated that Washington state laws include protections for especially dangerous jobs; overtime pay is both a protection for workers and meant to discourage employers from pushing workers into excessive hours. The ruling was in response to a lawsuit brought by farmworkers in the dairy industry, and will only apply expressly to that industry, but the phrasing, say lawyers who represented the farmworkers, could allow it to apply to all farmworkers in the state.
Washington is a significant agricultural state, leading the country in the production of fruits including apples, blueberries, and sweet cherries, all of which require more labor than, for example, corn and soy.
Farm owners were firmly against the decision, saying that the excess labor costs will harm an already struggling industry. Farmers say they can’t hire more farmworkers to work fewer hours, owing to a farmworker shortage that has only been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. And costs can’t be passed onto the consumer, they say, as Washington will be competing in markets with states that do not require overtime pay. The farmers say this will only hasten automation of farm work, though for delicate fruit work, automation is not yet an adequate replacement.
It’s possible that Washington’s ruling will have effects in other states. Because federal law does not require overtime pay for farmworkers, some states have already instituted some version of a state overtime law. California, for example, requires overtime pay for workers who exceed either 10 hours in a day or 60 hours in a week. With the FLSA unlikely to be amended given the conservative bent of the current United States Supreme Court, states might attempt to go to their own state supreme courts for a ruling friendlier to labor.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Washington State Supreme Court Rules Farmworkers Are Entitled to Overtime Pay
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
November 11, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
If this ruling results in new laws aside from dairy workers, I’m curious how they’ll implement it. A salary worker making $50k/yr with a budget of 2300 hours will exceed the 40hr/wk maximum before OT. Employers may simply reduce pay to the point where when their OT is added, they still earn the same $50k/yr for the same 2300 hours. Another option is farms could split entities to have employees working for two businesses, circumventing it that way. One way or another, it seems to only add bloating and burden to the system, making businesses craft new ways to keep… Read more »