The USDA Has Poured Money Into Farm Country, But Will it Be Enough to Help Re-Elect Trump?
Most farmers aren’t abandoning the president.
In the 2018 midterm elections, Republicans lost support in agricultural counties that suffered from retaliatory tariffs in President Donald Trump’s trade wars.
Since then, the Trump administration has doled out a record amount in bailouts to farmers to offset losses brought on by trade disruptions and the pandemic. Recent polls would suggest that these subsidies might be paying off, as the president’s support among farmers has reportedly surged back.
All along the campaign trail, Trump has bragged about the bailouts his administration has sent to farmers. In this year alone, researchers estimate the United States Department of Agriculture will distribute $46 billion to farmers. In 2019, the Trump administration paid $14.4 billion to farmers suffering from the president’s trade wars. These payments largely favored larger farms in the Midwest and the South in what observers say were attempts to shore up Trump’s rural base.
“Had the president not found some way to make up at least part of the loss that the trade war caused, I think the support would be much more in jeopardy,” says Ken Cook, the president of the Environmental Working Group, an organization that runs a database tracking all farm subsidies that have been distributed since 1995.
Farmers overwhelmingly supported Trump in 2016, and researchers say that support will likely hold this year, in part thanks to these payments, and despite the continued rise in farm bankruptcies. A Farm Futures poll in July found that 75 percent of farmers intended to vote for Trump. This was a significant jump from a poll the company conducted in 2018, which found only 60 percent of farmers would commit to casting a ballot for the president. In a Farm Journal Pulse poll this summer, 82 percent of respondents said they would vote for Trump.
Wendong Zhang, an economics professor at Iowa State University, says this support is partly rooted in these bailout payments. He says farmers experiencing higher income loss are less likely to voice support for the president, but that total farm income has risen this year by $10 billion. This is in large part thanks to the subsidies, which make up 40 percent of total farm income.
“For the support of the agriculture community, the president will capture the vast majority of voters working in the industry,” says Zhang.
Farmers, who are generally reliable Republican voters and free-market conservatives, have been willing to accept Trump’s bailouts, acknowledging that this year has been an anomaly and hoping his trade policies will work out. Grant Kimberley, an Iowa soybean and corn farmer, says farmers “prefer trade not aid,” but that the funding has been appreciated.
“Farmers know that we can’t have 40 percent of our income coming from [the] government,” says Kimberley, who serves as the director of market development for the Iowa Soybean Association. “That can’t be the case every single year. These are kind of unusual circumstances.”
Zhang’s research has shown that there is generally a belief among farmers that the losses from Trump’s trade wars will be short term and that his policies will make things better over time. Zhang says the farmers most likely to abandon Trump include dairy farmers and biofuel producers, as they have been hit hard during the pandemic and haven’t received as much in bailouts. Biofuel producers have also been at odds with the Trump administration’s policies concerning ethanol waivers for the oil industry. A potential loss of support among dairy farmers could be significant for Trump’s chances in Wisconsin, a state the president won in 2016 and in which he has been trailing former Vice President Joe Biden in recent polls.
Observers expect that the payments could secure turnout of Trump’s existing base in important states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio. But whether that support will be enough to tip the election in his favor is another question.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].The USDA Has Poured Money Into Farm Country, But Will it Be Enough to Help Re-Elect Trump?
by Alex Robinson, Modern Farmer
November 2, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
I am a small farmer. I have never gotten any aid. I did not vote for Trump. I voted early and in person. I think there are a lots of myths about what farmers think, live like, and believe. Not to mention what type of music they listen too. I like heavy metal, rock, the blues, I don’t listen to country music even though I own horses and have ridden across most of Kansas. I have a small farm in Ohio where we do rotational grazing with our goats, cows and a few horses. We have pastured poultry. Perhaps the… Read more »
MAGA! TRUMP 2020!