USDA Finalizes New SNAP Rules, Reducing Food Benefits for Millions
The new rules would also cause almost a million children to lose free school lunches.
A much-criticized proposed rule to change the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP—better known as food stamps—has been finalized by the USDA today.
In a telephone statement to the press, USDA secretary Sonny Perdue and deputy undersecretary for Food Nutrition and Consumer Services Brandon Lipps reiterated the talking points the USDA and the Trump administration have put forth surrounding these rules. “The rule restores the system to what Congress intended. That was assistance through difficult times, not a way of life,” said Perdue.
The new rule makes several changes to existing SNAP rules. First, it removes what’s called “Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility,” or BBCE: essentially a package program. BBCE is a shortcut that allows states to automatically enroll qualifying households and individuals in SNAP, based on their participation in other programs like Medicare. It says, well, the government already knows you qualify; why make you separately apply for SNAP?
The new rule would end that function entirely, which has the bonus of removing, according to the USDA’s own estimates, just under one million children from free school lunch programs. The USDA says that about half of those children would still be eligible; their families would simply have to re-apply. Certainly not all would, either not knowing or not understanding this whole change, meaning that many kids who qualify for free school lunches will soon not receive them.
Another change would affect able-bodied adults without dependents, or ABAWDs. Currently there are state-based waivers that allow flexibility for some of the rules for ABAWDs, based on unemployment rates. The new rule will reduce that flexibility, causing about 680,000 people currently receiving food benefits to lose them.
A study playing out those proposed rules estimated that, had the rules been in effect in 2018, about 3.7 million people would have lost SNAP benefits, and the total amount of money spent on SNAP benefits would have been lowered by $4.2 billion. In 2018, SNAP cost $68 billion in total. On the call, Lipps estimated savings of $5.5 billion over five years. Assuming SNAP costs $68 billion per year—this is generous, because SNAP actually has a lower budget now than it did a few years ago—that would mean a savings of about 1.6 percent over five years.
Lipps answered a few questions from reporters, following a statement from Secretary Perdue that largely, sometimes with verbatim language, echoed his recent op-ed in USA Today. He repeated language associating this policy with language from President Bill Clinton in 1996—one of the few times this administration has aligned itself with a Clinton—and emphasized the lowered federal unemployment rates as a reason for those receiving SNAP benefits to be removed. (He did not mention whether the available jobs actually pay enough for people to no longer qualify for SNAP. Millions of Americans work, often 40 or more hours a week, and still rely on SNAP.)
“At USDA, we’re taking action to reform our SNAP program in order to restore the dignity of work to a sizeable segment of our population, and be respectful of our taxpayers who fund the program,” said Perdue.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].USDA Finalizes New SNAP Rules, Reducing Food Benefits for Millions
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
December 4, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
But prisoners will keep being fed but our CHILDREN will starve basically
Actually, the only thing happening is the federal government is cracking down on agencies ignoring the requirements, assisting in the distribution of fraudulently obtatained benefits. Look around the welfare offices (or pretty much any government office) and you’ll see a bunch of lazy socialists. No wonder they’re helping other lazy socialists get handouts at the taxpayers’ expense.
In the meantime, the various military adventures are costing the government trillions of dollars, the wealthiest Americans just got another tax break, and Trump’s golf holidays are costing hundreds of thousand for each visit to his golf courses. Just like waging war on babies and small children by kidnapping them and stashing them in cells…..American babies, by the way….Trump specializes in capitalizing on the backs of the relatively powerless, as all bullies and cowards do.
Time to roll up your pants.
So our children will have to go without food at school and less food at home. How is that fair? Are you going to discuss the fact that we need more people to hire low income people also affordable house’s ? As it is it take’s three- four families to have a good home. We have so many homeless families, War vet’s with P.T.S.D they don’t get the help they deserve and disabled people living anywhere to stay warm and young adult kid’s. This is why people are going to be sleeping anywhere they can. This is so unfair to… Read more »