Farm Groups Respond (Not Well) to the Trump Administration’s Ethanol Plan
Following damaging decisions, a new proposal is not attracting any more fans.
Earlier this summer, the Trump administration extended ethanol waivers that could dramatically reduce the demand for ethanol—and thus American corn and soy.
Following extensive anger from farmers who felt they’d been betrayed by a president they’d helped elect, the Trump administration released a draft of an ethanol plan moving forward. Farmers are not soothed by it.
Those waivers—84 issued over the past three years—essentially allowed many refineries to bypass the typical requirements for using biofuel. Since nearly 40 percent of American corn is used for biofuel, that’s a huge hit to American farmers, one that could cost them tens of millions of dollars. Earlier this month, following outrage from farmers, the Trump administration promised to make things right by increasing the ethanol requirements in the future. Those increased numbers should even out with what the farmers lost in the past three years, right?
The EPA’s new proposed plan, released on October 15, only appears at first glance to make things right. The problem: the EPA isn’t actually counting how much ethanol went unsold over the past three years. Instead, they’re using the Department of Energy’s recommendations for how much ethanol should have been waived, and the EPA did not in the past three years follow those recommendations. The Department of Energy’s recommendations were wildly different from what actually happened; it’s estimated that the actual amount of lost ethanol sales was about twice what those recommendations say.
Faced with a solution that won’t bring their sales anywhere near back to normal, farmers and farm groups have issued many angry statements. “It is baffling to us that the proposal sets the three-year average of exempted volume using the very same DOE recommendations that EPA blatantly ignored over and over,” said Geoff Cooper, the president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association.
“Today, we are outraged the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not implement the details that were presented and outlined by the President only eleven days ago. Any proposal that does not account for actual waived gallons under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) fails to restore the integrity of the law,” said Jim Greif, the president of the Iowa Corn Growers Association. From the soybean side: “With today’s proposal, countless farm families and biodiesel producers will continue to face lost income and further job cuts. More facilities will close as a result of the continued inaction and the economic losses it creates,” said Tim Bardole, the president of the Iowa Soybean Association.
Corn and soy farmers rely on ethanol, and regardless of the debates on whether biofuel is actually an environmentally friendly option, those farmers are getting screwed here.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Farm Groups Respond (Not Well) to the Trump Administration’s Ethanol Plan
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
October 17, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Stop voting for a lunatic that doesn’t know what he’s doing.
The requirement for adding corn-based ethanol to gasoline was not a good idea to start with. Corn requires the best arable soil and very high fertilizer and pest control inputs, which contribute problems to the environment themselves. Now, if the source of ethanol was industrial hemp, which grows in the least arable soils and actually helps convert nonarable to arable soil, and requires little-to-no chemical inputs, then maybe. But the idea that we can grow our way out of the energy crisis has always been questionable.
american farmers do NOT put their money where their mouth is. i myself am NOT a farmer although i was a agriculture student, i drive a 2002 suburban with flex fuel l59 engine i do live in farm area as the fly’s are terrible because we live next door to several feed lots here in south dakota. the farm families i see around me do not pump biodiesel into the tanks of their trucks and they always pump the non ethanol fuel into the family car, atv etc.. if they want to sell more corn then maybe they should consume… Read more »