Remember “Pink Slime”? It Can Now Be Marketed As “Ground Beef”
A journey into the world of meat extrusions.
You might remember the phrase “pink slime” from a 2012 video, showing the extrusion of a bubblegum-pink substance oozing into a coiled pile. That stuff was mechanically separated meat, used in stuff like hot dogs and some chicken nuggets. But that phrase is also applied to a different method of using meat scraps, one technically called “lean finely textured beef,” or LFTB. (We’ll refer to it that way, to avoid confusion.) The company that makes this LFTB product, Beef Products Incorporated, recently notified its customers that the product can now be called something different, and more appetizing: ground beef.
LFTB is not necessarily dangerous or mysterious or even particularly gross, in the abstract. During the butchering process, meat trimmings are captured. The trimmings are then sent through a centrifuge, which separates the fat from the meat; trimmings are very high in fat. The fat can be sold separately as tallow, but the now 95 percent lean (or so) is then treated to prevent contaminants and then processed into an ooze. Mechanically separated meat, most often poultry, is produced differently, by pressure-forcing scraps through a fine sieve to remove chunks of bone and cartilage. (It’s been illegal for about 15 years to sell mechanically separated beef.)
Previously, LFTB was sometimes folded into ground beef sold in supermarkets, or more commonly sold to fast-food purveyors for use in burgers. The anti-contaminant treatment used by BPI is ammonia, which is legal in the US but not in Canada or in the European Union, where LFTB is thus banned.
BPI has tried since the release of the 2012 video to rehabilitate the image of its meat extrusions. They had an ad campaign (“Dude, it’s beef!”) which was promoted not only by the company but by politicians in states with large cattle industries, like Texas. And now, according to Beef Magazine (an industry publication), BPI asked the USDA to reclassify the product.
Until now, LFTB could not be sold under the name “ground beef.” It could be combined with ground beef and sold as ground beef, but not by itself. There may or may not have been some changes to the product—a great report from New Food Economy showed BPI was not entirely eager to show off claimed changes—but regardless, the USDA chose to allow the new name.
Despite the fact that this product is not, well, ground in a grinder, but instead separated via centrifuge and processed, it can be sold simply as ground beef. It’s probably worth noting that, ammonia aside, there’s nothing inherently objectionable about the product; it is, really, processed beef trimmings, which would normally go to waste. The issue is more about consumer understanding. If, as the beef industry is claiming, it’s unfair to consumers to call plant-based products “meat,” wouldn’t it be just as unfair to call lean finely textured beef “ground beef”?
Correction: A previous version of this article did not properly distinguish between mechanically separated meat and LFTB. We apologize for the error.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Remember “Pink Slime”? It Can Now Be Marketed As “Ground Beef”
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
February 22, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
This process is disgusting! And the fact our government would approve this chemical laced product to be produced just goes to show that “corporate money” can buy whatever process/politician it wants with care for the people it wants to feed.
Last time I checked any product treated with ammonia is off my list of safe foods.. Canada and the UK concur and have banned this nasty product that was was called “unsafe for human consumption by an US government inspector..
Please do your research. The photo you mentioned in your article is fake. “Pink Slime” has such a negative connotation that it scares consumers, when actually it is okay to eat. ABC first released a news story around this topic, was sued, and lost. Lazy journalism.
Interested in pink slime info for consumers