What’s Going on With the Roundup-Causes-Cancer Monsanto Lawsuit?
A judge runs up against a wall of scientific non-consensus.
Following a 2015 decision by the World Health Organization to label glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Monsanto’s hugely successful Roundup products, a probable carcinogen, hundreds of lawsuits against Monsanto were filed. Now, the 300-plus cases in the federal courts have been gathered together to be presented in front of U.S. district judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco. It is the first case in the US that will rule on whether Roundup is carcinogenic and toxic, which makes it a huge deal for the entire agricultural industry.
The case was filed on behalf of hundreds of farmers and their families who assert that they have been affected by non-Hodgkins lymphoma as a result of exposure to glyphosate. Monsanto, for its part, says that claims about glyphosate’s connection to cancer are based on “junk science,” and that the plaintiffs’ research is cherry-picked, limited, and flawed. The plaintiffs say they have examined and are using a wide range of studies.
This week, Judge Chhabria is hearing testimony from experts: oncologists, toxicologists, public health profesionals, and others. Dubbed “science week,” this stretch of the trial will allow Judge Chhabria to decide which experts, and which data, will be allowed to be presented at trial. It’s a massively important part of the lawsuit; Chhabria has the ability to effectively cripple the arguments of both sides by throwing out key expert witnesses.
Bloomberg reports that Chhabria – who was appointed by President Obama and clerked for Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer – seems unconvinced by both sides, calling the evidence “shaky.” Bloomberg quotes Chhabria as describing epidemiology as “loosey-goosey” and a “highly subjective field.” Effectively, this means Monsanto has achieved their goal, which is to make the evidence linking glyphosate to cancer seem uncertain. (Monsanto has previously been accused by publications like La Monde of waging war on independent scientists by attempting to discredit the WHO decision. The company has also been accused of paying scientists to manufacture studies indicating glyphosate is safe.
If Chhabria decides that there are no real conclusions to be drawn, he can’t, and would not, issue any kind of ban. The WHO, for example, excluded many studies on the basis that they were not published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. That’s not a bad idea, and it’s standard practice. But according to Monsanto, that shows that the WHO cherry-picked evidence – so who can trust them?
Chhabria has heard the scientific experts and will now weigh which experts will be allowed to testify. There is no indication of when he’ll make his decision.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].What’s Going on With the Roundup-Causes-Cancer Monsanto Lawsuit?
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
March 15, 2018
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Chhabria was not fit to decide !
George Hall, I have said more than that . One thing he states no basis for his conclusions , so what , nobody else does so, either . They all believe they are perfect .