Is This 3-Foot-Long Phallic Clam Killing Puget Sound?
When even the most responsible farming turns out to have an unexpected impact on the environment.
So first, a primer: geoduck, pronounced, in the face of all logic, “gooey duck,” is a giant clam native to the coastal areas of the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia. In the wild, it can live for more than a century and grow to more than three feet long, most of that a giant phallic siphon that protrudes from the all-too-small shell. Geoduck is a delicacy anywhere people have good taste: it’s especially popular in China and Vietnam, but any good seafood chef will know it and love it.
It’s also tremendously valuable, earning up to $100 per pound when exported. That’s led to a boom in geoduck farming, and it turns out that the geoducks happen to love Puget Sound, a heavily populated inlet not too far from Seattle. We’ve profiled the biggest geoduck farmer in the region, Taylor Shellfish Farms, which has attracted a fair amount of criticism from locals about the way the geoduck is farmed.
Neighbors sometimes have issues with the specific farming strategy, which relies on baby clams being planted, like seeds, in the sands of the shallow sound. But because there are plenty of animals that would love to prey on baby geoduck, farmers stick a PVC pipe around the baby clams (which protects them from underwater predators like fish and snails) and covers that with mesh netting (which protects them from aerial predators like herons). These farms look pretty strange in the low tide, like a robot farm that’s growing pipes instead of delicious bivalves.
Critics have long held that the extensive geoduck farming in Puget Sound is harming the environment, but until now, that hasn’t been a particularly effective argument: Clams generally are not very invasive creatures to farm, and the geoducks are farmed without any sort of pesticide. But the very first long-term study of Puget Sound geoduck farming, conducted jointly by researchers from the University of Washington and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center, was just released, and in part, it confirms their suspicions.
What’s interesting here is that the actual geoduck does not seem to be much of a problem; the study concludes that there could be twice as many clams in the sound without negatively affecting the environment. Where the farming harms the environment is in those unsightly PVC pipes and mesh netting, but not always in the way you might expect. For example! Certain fish and crabs have actually been shown to increase in number with the addition of the farms, because they can swim or crawl under the netting, which protects them from predators.
But a move like that can send problematic ripples throughout the entire ecosystem. With those fish and crabs finding themselves accidentally protected, birds like herons and eagles and predatory fish like salmon have been deserting Puget Sound.
The study didn’t look at the entire region, but its conclusion seems clear. Geoduck farming isn’t, by any stretch, the worst sort of farming for the environment. But it also doesn’t make sense to ignore that any large-scale farming in a wild environment will have an impact – and it’s important to figure out how to lessen that impact.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
October 30, 2015
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.