New Zealand Wants to Tax Cow Burps and Farts
The tax would apply to methane emissions from livestock, starting in 2025.
New Zealand Wants to Tax Cow Burps and Farts
The tax would apply to methane emissions from livestock, starting in 2025.
As of last summer, the island nation of New Zealand was home to 6.3 million head of dairy cattle, up 82 percent over the last two decades. The country also holds 3.8 million beef cattle, 800,000 deer and a whopping 26.8 million head of sheep. That’s a lot of livestock for a country of about five million people.
That’s also a lot of methane emissions, mainly in the form of cow burps and farts. (When it comes to cattle, about 90 to 95 percent of the methane produced comes from burps.) Agriculture is responsible for more than half of the methane production across New Zealand, and methane is a huge contributor to global warming and air pollution. In an effort to cut down on the greenhouse gas emissions, the government unveiled a new tax proposal last month.
By 2025, all farms across New Zealand would have to track and manage their greenhouse gas emissions, and pay a levy according to how much they are pumping out. They could also earn credits for planting crops that sequester carbon, including trees. This tax would be the first of its kind globally.
The plan was put together by the ruling Labor government, headed by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, along with primary sector groups. The government and industry partnership was named He Waka Eke Noa, from a Māori proverb, meaning “we’re all in this together.”’
Although climate change minister James Shaw told Reuters the emissions pricing system will play a key part in how the country cuts methane emissions, the plan has some detractors—some from Shaw’s own party. While he is a cabinet minister, Shaw is also the co-leader of the federal Green party, which believes the plan doesn’t go far enough.
The Green’s agricultural spokesperson, MP Teanau Tuiono, said it’s not clear if the plan will help the country reach their goal of being net-zero by 2050. Tuiono even tweeted “He Waka Eke Noa? He Waka Eke Nowhere more like.”
Some New Zealand farmers have asked to have greater input in the tax’s pricing structure. Meanwhile, other environmental activists say it simply won’t be effective at all. Instead, they’ve called for a drastic reduction in the amount of cattle, saying it’s the only way to truly cut down on emissions.
The proposal, and the specific pricing guidelines are still up for debate. Climate minister Shaw said the government would need to continue consultation before it commits to specifics of the plan. A decision is expected by the end of the year.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Emily Baron Cadloff, Modern Farmer
July 8, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
How stupid is this? The environmentalists think the island of New Zealand will impact the world by cutting normal cattle digestive processes. This is an absurdity in the highest. Nobody except government leftists thinks that this will change the equation one iota. The premise and policy are folly. I hope that clear-thinking citizens will rise up and say nyet to this insane policy. Surely there are more pressing issues than this.
I live in New Zealand and am a researcher working in the agri and climate sectors. The headline on this article (as has coverage around the world) is inaccurate and unhelpful. Like every industry, the primary sector has to account for its GHG emissions. The NZ government gave farmers a leave pass from the Emissions Trading Scheme (that every other industry must submit to) to allow industry, government and Māori to develop a scheme to reward farmers for reducing CO2 emissions and levy the remaining emissions to fund research into methane reduction. This is not a tax – it’s an… Read more »
Anything that Klaus Schwab boot licker Ardern proposes should be thrown out the nearest window as soon as it comes out of her mouth. Do you want to eat insects? Because she and the globalists are taking you there, for your own good.
How stupid is this? The environmentalists think the island of New Zealand will impact the world by cutting normal cattle digestive processes. This is an absurdity in the highest. Nobody except government leftists thinks that this will change the equation one iota. The premise and policy are folly. I hope that clear-thinking citizens will rise up and say nyet to this insane policy. Surely there are more pressing issues than this.
Perhaps this will encourage farmers to switch to producing vegan foods. Massive amounts of land, food, energy, and water are needed to raise animals for food, and it also causes significant animal suffering.