A Shift to Farming Made Our Ancestors Shorter
Humans lost inches in height when they switched from hunting and foraging to farming, likely due to malnourishment.
When most people think of farmers, a measly or malnourished person is likely not the first descriptor that comes to mind. Recent research, however, suggests otherwise about some of the earliest farmers.
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that humans, who lived in Europe about 12,000 years ago, had their height stunted by as much as 1.5 inches after abandoning their hunter-gatherer lifestyles to sow crops in the fields. This, according to researchers, indicates that the population was not healthy or getting the nutrients it needed. The reason for this could be due to a number of factors, such as a less diverse diet compared to hunters, gatherers and foragers. Increased pathogen loads may have also played a role, they say, with human populations being more concentrated and closer to livestock.
The findings include the work and collaboration of more than 40 academics around the world who looked at the DNA and skeletal remains of 167 humans from before, after or around the time when agriculture emerged in Europe.
[RELATED: Early Farmers Changed the Climate (and We’re Still Feeling it Today)]
Lead author Stephanie Marciniak said the study is unique because it considers the additional impact external factors may have on height. DNA and more specific information around genetic ancestry have widely been the topic of interest in recent studies investigating height, she explained.
“We started thinking about the longstanding questions around the shift from hunting, gathering and foraging to sedentary farming and decided to look at the health effect with height as a proxy,” said Marciniak, an assistant research professor at Penn State University’s Department of Anthropology in State College, Pennsylvania.
Approximately 80 percent of height is derived from genetic makeup while 20 percent is from environmental factors, the study said. Research has not yet determined all genetic variants associated with height.
The researchers created a model that factored in adult height, indicators of stress seen in the bones and ancient DNA. The height was analyzed over the period of 38,000 to 2,400 years ago, and remains were categorized based on whether the specimen was alive before the Neolithic age, during the Neolithic age (10,000–4,500 BC), the Copper age (4,500–3,500 BC), the Bronze age (3,300-1,200 BC) or the Iron age (1,200-600 BC). Part of the data collection included skeletal remains that had been already sampled for ancient DNA testing by other researchers conducting additional studies.
Initially, they found that humans from the Neolithic age were on average 1.5 inches shorter than previous individuals and 0.87 inches shorter than the other groups. Height then steadily increased through the Copper age (by 0.77 inches), the Bronze age (by 1.06 inches) and the Iron age (by 1.29 inches).
Findings changed slightly when researchers incorporated genetic ancestral information, which showed some humans inherited height. “There was movement of people, generally from east to west. We wanted to account for that migration that perhaps brought different proportions of height-associated genetic variants,” Marciniak explained.
The height decrease was adjusted with these factors in mind. But the height drop around the start of the era of farming was still evident. Between the pre- and post- Neolithic era, researchers calculated an average height loss of 1.1 inches.
Given that this study worked with only 167 specimens, researchers hope to conduct additional studies with larger datasets. They say this will be necessary to produce stronger conclusions. They also said their model could be applied to other studies to look at additional human health factors over time.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].A Shift to Farming Made Our Ancestors Shorter
by Lindsay Campbell, Modern Farmer
April 28, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Would probably be best to put in the title “European” ancestors, the study doesn’t look at other areas of the world which might change results. Otherwise, interesting, more questions than answers, like if it affected their nutrients, why did they push through and keep farming?