How Can Farmers Coexist With Wolves?
A new study focusing on wolves in Spain offers some insight.
How Can Farmers Coexist With Wolves?
A new study focusing on wolves in Spain offers some insight.
Wolves, and their predation of livestock, are a major issue for farmers, whether that’s a perception or a reality. And large carnivores are coming back to places where they had previously been eliminated, thanks to improved conservation efforts and, as in the case of the Eastern Coyote, one carnivore moving into an ecological niche where it had never been before.
Put simply, farmers care about wolves. But how can we balance the needs and desires of farmers with the protection of large carnivores? A new study from researchers at the University of Leeds looks at several communities in Spain that are dealing with wolves to find out how best to handle this delicate interaction.
Before we get into this study, it’s probably important to note that wolves are not, in any statistically proven way, a significant problem for American ranchers. Some reporting of wolf kills, such as those from the National Agricultural Statistics Service, rely on self-reporting from ranchers, and they do not verify whether wolves were actually responsible for livestock deaths. Wolves and other large predators account for just a small percentage of all livestock losses in the United States; compared with digestive or respiratory illness, predators are not significant.
Even when we look at predator-caused deaths of cattle in the US, wolves are not at the top of the list. Of those deaths, according to 2015 USDA data, more than 40 percent of cattle deaths are attributed to coyotes. More than 11 percent are attributed to domestic or feral dogs. Wolves? Less than five percent. That is, incredibly, lower than the cattle deaths attributed to vultures. It’s the same thing for sheep: wolves account for only 1.3 percent of sheep deaths attributed to predators, far less than the percentage for both coyotes and dogs. It’s worth noting that those are national figures and that predator-attributed deaths are localized. East of the Mississippi, for example, wolf-attributed deaths would be zero. In a handful of areas, wolves might be a much larger issue. But nationally, the numbers stand: Wolves and other predators are not one of the biggest causes of livestock death. Somehow, though, wolves have become a national issue.
The agriculture and forestry industry, with agribusiness-leaning entities such as the American Farm Bureau leading the pack, have made wolves out to be a major problem for American ranchers, even demanding that wolves be delisted from the Endangered Species Act (which would enable ranchers to shoot and kill them). The researchers behind this new study note this discrepancy. According to lead author Hanna Pettersson, “The main problem with wolves in areas where wolves and people shared space was often less about the wolves themselves, but about economic and social pressures that were threatening the livelihoods, cultures and autonomy of local communities. For different reasons, the wolves often came to represent these pressures.”
This is a larger ecological problem, because wolves are among the few large predators still existing in the United States. Having extirpated, either nationally or locally, animals such as the grizzly bear, mountain lion and grey wolf, the animals on which they’ve preyed (such as deer) have exploded in population and evolved into an environmental issue.
Wolves are an easy scapegoat, regardless of the realities of how detrimental they are to ranching. This study looked at various locations in Spain, where wolves are thriving, often in areas where they had not lived for quite some time. The study finds that there are several methods to cope with both the realities and the perceptions of wolves’ impact on agriculture. For the realities, strategies differ based on the specifics of different locations. Guard dogs were found to be very effective in some locations, along with nighttime fencing and accompanying herds while they graze.
But these aren’t cheap; large operations will need dozens of dogs, and smaller ones will find it harder to afford the purchase, training and upkeep of dogs, in addition to the labor and construction of fencing. The study suggests that governmental programs would be highly effective if they provided funding and assistance for these sorts of practices, ideally tailored for the local needs of each ranch.
Equally important, though, is education and information. Ranchers, according to this study, have to understand and appreciate their coexistence with wolves and other large predators, and not to see them as an inviolable threat. This idea, though, has been difficult to implement in the US. In the case of coyotes, which are a much larger problem for cattle than wolves (though not endangered at all), many parts of the country have no history with the animal, because the species has only recently arrived. (The first coyote was spotted in the Northeast for the first time in the mid-to-late 1940s.) There’s no sense of historical coexistence, because there is no historical coexistence. And there are also major influencers, such as the American Farm Bureau, which makes predation a talking point.
For wolves, though, the main challenge is to thoughtfully prepare agricultural producers and communities for the animal’s return and continued existence. Simple payment for wolf-death schemes have not been effective; it’s hard to prove that a wolf killed some of your cattle, for one thing, and that also doesn’t serve any kind of preventive or long-term solution. Instead, there must be more detailed plans to fund sustainable protection, and, at least as importantly, encourage a sense of community with the wolves. They’re a part of the landscape of North America, and this whole concept would require a lot of dialogue between the government and livestock producers to figure out the best way forward.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
September 16, 2021
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
Wolves HAVE been delisted from the Endangered Species Act. They are on track to be decimated in the western states with the new expansion of hunting and trapping allowances in Montana and Idaho. These include an extended hunting season with increased kills allowed per license, ‘reimbursement’ (aka bounty) for expenses, night hunting, snaring, and other non-‘fair chase’ practices.
Wisconsin’s season was cut short when 218 wolves were killed in 3 days.
Wolves are need to balance the ecosystem please stop killing them
Don’t worry I read another article and it said that on February 10th 2022 a judge ruled in favor of the wolves and told US Fish and Wildlife Service to remove the federal Endangered Species Act. This allowed the wolves to keep their protections in most of the lower 48 states. So the wolves are slowly getting their protections back. This article is “Gray Wolf” by John w. Frank