Tainted Rye May Have Been the Real Culprit of the Salem Witch Trials
The eerie turn of events may have roots in agriculture.
Tainted Rye May Have Been the Real Culprit of the Salem Witch Trials
The eerie turn of events may have roots in agriculture.
The Salem Witch Trials have confounded historians for centuries. Experts have debated what caused this dark chapter in seventeenth century history that saw 20 people executed after they were accused of bewitching girls in Salem, Massachusetts.
Some think a nearby battle in the Native American Wars may have contributed to the hysteria that consumed the town. Others believe the bewitched girls were simply acting up out of a sense of teenage rebellion. But another theory is that these events may have been kicked off by an agriculture-related cause: bread that contained a hallucinogenic fungus called ergot.
The trials began in the spring of 1692 after two girls in Salem were reported hallucinating, throwing fits, making strange sounds and contorting themselves. Similar experiences were recorded among six other girls and a total of 150 people were accused of witchcraft in the subsequent trials. In the 1970s, Linnda Caporael, a graduate student at the University of California at Santa Barbara, came up with the theory that these girls were acting this way because they ingested the fungus ergot. This fungus can grow in rye, wheat and other cereals, and if consumed can cause an affliction called ergotism. Some of the symptoms of ergotism include muscle spasms, psychosis, double visions, nausea and sweating—not unlike what these young girls were supposedly experiencing.
Ergot thrives in warm, damp climates. Caporeal, who is now a professor at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, made her case in a paper that argued there were swampy-like weather conditions in the village’s western region during the year before the witch trials started, which would have let the fungus thrive. She also noted that the first two girls were probably fed grain that grew from that area and that the others lived in the west.
Some academics have agreed with Caporeal, but a number have also disputed her theory. Nicholas Spanos and Jack Gottlieb, a pair of psychologists in Canada, most notably wrote a report that looked to dismantle certain aspects of the ergotism argument. They claimed that this kind of ergotism usually occurs in populations that have a lack of vitamin A in their diet, but because the village was located on the eastern coast, they say the people would have access to fish and other imports that would have prevented deficiency.
They also said that if ergot was in the food supply, the symptoms would have been experienced on a house-by-house basis and not in select individuals. And common symptoms like vomiting, diarrhea and discolored skin did not present themselves in the afflicted people. Spanos and Gottlieb point to witness accounts that said the girls normally until prompted by when an accused individual entered a room. If they had ergotism, they say this behavior wouldn’t have been expressed this way.
Caporael’s theory isn’t the only agriculture-related one that has been considered by academics. Suzy Witten, the author of The Afflicted Girls, argues that the victims could have been poisoned with jimson weed. The plant, which is part of the nightshade family, can cause hallucinations.
While there are many theories, the mystery persists around what could have caused the Salem Witch Trials. We may never know why they happened, but we can take some comfort in knowing these events—which inspired some pretty scary movies—weren’t caused by actual witches. (At least I hope so.)
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Lindsay Campbell, Modern Farmer
October 31, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
Alright, I’ll be the first one to say it. It is deeply sinister to try so hard to find some reasoning for what could posses a group of people to act in such horrifying ways. Just accept that when accountability is low, humans can give even Satan a run for his money.
Is supposably now an acceptable word in English?
This has LONG been disproven as a theory. Why do people keep returning this nonsense?
Bored teenaged girls looking to ease the boredom of New England life
After watching the Democrat Partys behavior for the past 4 years..I completely understand why and how the Salem witch trials came about..
This has been disproveb since first theorized.
1. No record of digestive issues in the accusers
2. Repeated poisoning can cause death. No one died
3. The rye affected no other household members besides these girls .
I am sorry to say that this theory was debunked by Salem Witch Trials Experts, but it still persists.
https://youtu.be/8rCTLddefno
Seems like the hysteria at the Salem Witch Trials are quite similar to the hysteria voiced these days by the Fox (not) news.
I think that it was caused by Lead Poisoning from the bootlegged Liquor that they made and drank so much of back then
This was just a form of land grabbing as was done by the English 100 + yrs prior