Agriculture Emits More Sulfur Than Any Other Man-Made Source: Study
But what exactly does this mean for the world?
Sulfur emissions, largely from coal plants, were pinpointed as a major cause of acid rain in the 1980s and 1990s.
Changes to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations lessened the problem of acid rain, but now, a new study from the University of Colorado, Boulder finds that there’s a new big producer of sulfur in the environment: Agriculture.
Sulfur is acidic, and when it falls as rain and makes its way to sources of water like rivers and lakes, it can do serious damage to the environment. But it’s also pretty useful for farmers.
Though nitrogen is, as AgWeb puts it, “the foundation of high corn yields,” sulfur is also vital for the crop. Over the past few decades, an increasing number of fertilizers have included some form of sulfur, and it’s been sold separately as a fertilizer in its own right. Sulfur helps with developing chlorophyll, which is why sulfur-deficient plants may appear yellow, and it also assists the plant in its ability to metabolize nitrogen, its main fertilizer. It’s become quite popular, especially with row crops like corn, in part because of the lessening of acid rain. Farmers used to get sulfur for free, from the sky. Now, they have to add it themselves.
The new study from Colorado looked at how much sulfur was being applied in three different crops, sort of iconic for their region: Corn in the Midwest, sugarcane in Florida, and wine grapes in California. They found that levels of sulfur are rising as it’s added to cropland. In those agricultural areas, the level of sulfur was dramatically higher than it was even at the peak of acid rain, but now it’s a localized increase, rather than the broad-scale sprinkling of acid rain.
This is all concerning, but the big question, researchers say, is what the effects of excess sulfur are on the soil and environment. Research in the wetlands of Florida indicated that excess sulfur is linked to the production of methyl mercury, which causes developmental and reproductive problems in both humans and wildlife. There’s an increasing body of research finding that farmers may need to add sulfur to their crops to make up for the lack of acid rain, but there’s hardly any research about how that could affect the environment.
The Colorado researchers say it is vital to start monitoring and investigating this use of sulfur, to figure out proper amounts and whether there is an adverse effect on soil microbes, plants, animals, and human health.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Agriculture Emits More Sulfur Than Any Other Man-Made Source: Study
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
August 14, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Excessive sulfate fertilizers creates high sulfates in the plant tissue. Commercial fertilizers that are not biologically based creates an excess.
I wonder if planting in ancient native methods would help with natural addition of sulfur. I recently had to study high content sulfur vegetables which were cauciferous (sp?) ..broccoli, cauliflower, asparagus. The same week I also saw articles that taught Native American methods for mixed crop rows due to nutrient exchanges. stalk support for corn and next another plant resolved groundcover for warmth and weed control.
Is this a situation where concentrating on a single crop requiring sulphur is the problem or is it something that must be added across the board?
To Brad’s point, they didn’t use a single that may be more predisposed to sulpher needs however, big crops e.g. sugar cane, wheat and corn have massive acreage…therefore the dispersion or “runoff” of “extra” sulpher production which is extends to methyl mercury…in the air is concerning..especially if the MM composition is proven as more damaging to plant life/health and of course animals/humans. t
We have an economically viable sulfur replacement, All Phase, composed of ingredients deemed by the EPA as to pose a minimal risk to human health and the environment and where every ingredient is FDA approved as food additives. It is exempt from requirements of EPA residue tolerances. Efficacy at a low rate of 0.33 lbs/acre had the same results in controlling powdery mildew in strawberries as 5 lbs/acre of micronized sulfur (Cal Poly Strawberry Center Field Trial, 2022). At that rate cost is comparable to sulfur. University field trials at higher rates have provided better results than sulfur. If growers… Read more »