The EPA Decides Ranchers Can Use Cyanide Bombs to Kill Coyotes
The M-44 bomb is designed to kill coyotes and stop them from preying on cattle. Critics say it’s unnecessary and egregiously dangerous.
Despite protests from groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity, the EPA this week announced that it will not ban the device known as the M-44—a cyanide bomb.
The M-44 is cited by cattlemen’s organizations and ranchers as a vital tool for protecting cattle against predators, especially coyotes. To critics, it’s a flagrantly dangerous device that often kills or injures non-targeted animals, and it’s one that isn’t necessary regardless of its efficiency. The EPA’s ruling adds a few restrictions around where an M-44 can be placed, but mostly, it’s a statement that this EPA intends to allow use of the bomb.
The M-44 is sometimes known as a cyanide trap or cyanide bomb. It’s installed in a hole dug in the earth, and smeared with a bait, such as animal fat. When it’s grabbed and pulled by an animal, the M-44 sends up a dose of sodium cyanide, which combines with water in the animal’s mouth, creating a lethal dose of cyanide poison.
The EPA’s press release on the subject makes sure to imply that coyotes are a significant predator of American cattle, and a scourge to ranchers. “A 2015 National Agricultural Statistics Survey (NASS) study found that coyotes accounted for 40.5 percent of cattle death losses due to predators, or approximately 17,000 deaths,” reads the release. That’s absolutely true, but it ignores the larger context, which is that predators as a whole accounted for only 2.4 percent of cattle deaths in 2015. Sure, 17,000 were lost to coyotes, but there are approximately 95 million head of cattle in the United States.
According to that same NASS study, respiratory problems killed more than 900,000 cattle and calves in 2015. Poisoning took more than 30,000. Hell, cattle rustling was responsible for 24,000. Obviously, coyotes are an issue, and in some places a larger issue than others, but as a whole, predator deaths are a minuscule cause for concern for the cattle industry.
The M-44 was also responsible for killing more than 300 non-targeted animals, including pets and endangered animals, in 2016, according to the Washington Post. Reports of people walking their dogs, only to find that dog triggering an M-44 and immediately dying, pop up on an annual basis. In 2017, after a dog was killed and a boy injured by an M-44, the state of Idaho issued a complete ban on the bombs.
There are also plenty of alternatives to the M-44. Guard animals, including llamas and donkeys, have proven tremendously effective at keeping predators away from livestock. Large guard dogs have been a great option for guarding livestock for time immemorial. Yet the Trump administration has chosen to allow the M-44.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].The EPA Decides Ranchers Can Use Cyanide Bombs to Kill Coyotes
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
December 11, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Livestock guardian dogs and others are a great option to supplement other tools like the mechanical M-44, they aren’t a substitute to protect livestock during calving and lambing. The Obama administration also recognized the value of the M-44.
Cyanide bombs are banned in Oregon.
Livestock Guardian Dogs are an excellent solution for coyotes, mountain lions, etc
They probably would protect children in schools from shooters if we gave them a chance.
Please don’t use this horrible method. Leave the coyotes alone n