Does Certified Organic Mean What We Think It Does?
Here are five ways it does not.
Does Certified Organic Mean What We Think It Does?
Here are five ways it does not.
There’s something of a civil war brewing in the organic movement. On one side are industry boosters boasting about how organic has gone mainstream. These folks are fine with a Big Ag version of organic agriculture—enormous monocrop fields and global distribution to every Walmart across the land. On the other side are purists who feel that the spirit of organic—building healthy soil, promoting biodiversity, focusing on small producers and distributing regionally—is no longer represented by the USDA certified organic label (hence the various alternative organic labels popping up).
The USDA certification has never explicitly required any of those things, however. Instead, organic rules focus primarily on substituting natural fertilizers and pest control methods for chemical ones. But even here things aren’t quite as they seem.
Does Organic Mean Toxin-Free?
Not entirely. USDA standards allow the use of several dozen synthetic chemicals on certified organic farms, although most are fairly benign substances, and those that aren’t tend to be heavily restricted in the ways that they can be applied (certain synthetic fertilizers are also permitted in limited circumstances). More of an issue is that some of the naturally derived substances permitted for use as pesticides are used in unnatural concentrations that make them highly toxic (to creatures such as bees, for example). Rotenone, a notoriously toxic but naturally derived pesticide, was on the list of permitted substances until last year.
Does Organic Mean Local?
Not at all. Organic products constitute around five percent of food sales in the United States, but only about one percent of U.S. farmland is organic, suggesting that most organic food is imported. Organic certification does not take carbon footprints into account—and it’s fairly clear that organic grapes flown in from Chile have a larger environmental impact than their locally grown but conventional counterparts.
Does Organic Mean Grown on a Small, Diversified Farm?
The organic standards say nothing about size and little about diversity. Things such as hedgerows for habitat are encouraged by the standards, but there is nothing in the rules that prevents organic farmers from planting monocultures fence line to fence line.
Does Organic Mean Livestock Roam Free and Forage on Grass?
This is an extremely contentious topic between Big Organic and the purists. Organic livestock must be provided access to the outdoors and, depending on the species, must receive a portion of their diet from foraging. But there are a lot of convoluted rules—some would call them loopholes—regarding how those requirements can be met. The bottom line is that it’s possible to stick to the letter of the organic law and run a livestock operation that differs little from a confined animal feeding operation, aka factory farming.
Does Organic Mean Topsoil is Restored?
Rebuilding topsoil that teems with microbial life was the foundation of the organic movement in the 1960s. This was a response to the sterile, eroded soil that 20th-century conventional agriculture methods left across the planet. The inconvenient truth is that organic agriculture requires frequent cultivation to control weeds, leaving it bare and susceptible to erosion. In the 21st century, conventional agriculture is increasingly based on the use of herbicide-tolerant GMO crops that have vastly reduced the amount of tillage required, cutting down significantly on erosion (at the cost of greater herbicide use, however). Erosion as a result of frequent cultivation isn’t much of an issue on a small diversified farm, but large monocultures of organic produce are likely to lose more topsoil each year than well-managed conventional ones.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Brian Barth, Modern Farmer
September 16, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
You are on target with the discussion regarding the misconception of Organic meaning “Small Farm”. This could not be more accurate than in the Dairy world where Organic Valley has pushed harder and harder to high producing large scale and yes even robotic farms over their traditional truly small farms. I have seen this first hand with Organic Valley over the last decade plus. O.V. maintains their Amish farmers, so that they can portray the image that they want to put in front of the consumer. Just ask where the volume of milk is obtained from, it is not from… Read more »
Lots of inaccuracies in this article. For one, the approved “chemical” list is small and can only be used if they prove it necessary (such as an infestation of insects). Second, organic farming tends to focus on no till practices. See Rodale Institute for real information on organic farming and the truth about regulations.
Despite any inaccuracies in details, I appreciate the article’s pointing to important differences in big organic and small diversified farms selling mostly locally. NOP has been helpful for distinguishing conventionally grown from “certified organic” in the grocery store, but I prefer the quality of fresh and locally grown – even without the Cert Org seal – and from farmers I can talk with directly. For conscious food consumers, the highest standard might not require regulation at all: Seasonal, Organic, Unprocessed, Local.
Two major inaccuracies in this article. The National Organic Program’s National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances details about 25 synthetic products that are allowed to be used in organic crop production, not “several dozen” as this article states. Meanwhile, there are more than 900 synthetic pesticides approved for conventional production. The EPA cancelled all food uses of rotenone by 2010. “After implementation of the National Organic Program (NOP) in 2002, no rotenone formulations registered by EPA were ever deemed in compliance with the NOP.” Rotenone wasn’t on the NOP’s list of permitted substances until last year. https://hygeia-analytics.com/2017/01/04/rotenone-use-in-organic-farming/
The system is based on the producer being honest and the certifier confirming their honesty. And this article makes no suggestion as how to make a better system. There has faults, but the consumer has a responsibility to educate themselves as to what they are buying. Don’t like Aurora Dairy, don’t buy their product. Although organic doesn’t mean local, neither does local mean organic. Yes I can use those products if I have not been able to control a pest, but I have to try other methods first. SO what do you want me to do? use them, go out… Read more »
As a agricultural producer I’ve always questioned the ethics behind organic. By creating a demand for organic we are reducing global food production. In order for me to be an organic grower (and obviously my farm is not necessarily the same as all farms) I would essentially be halving my output but due to the increased value not my net profit. In my circumstance the increased sale price doesn’t offset the decreased yield but this isn’t the case for everyone. From a grower business perspective I get it but from the ethically minded consumer I don’t understand the mindset behind… Read more »
I’m baffled by all this nonsense about “organic” farming. Folks, this is mostly an elitist marketing hustle that supposedly justifies a higher price for your food: it doesn’t mean what you think it means. I did conventional farming for over 50 years, checked out the organic farming craze, and was totally unimpressed. I’m a fan of small family farms and low chemical use and the whole nine yards, but as a working farmer I was, and still am, utterly unimpressed with “certified organic” and all that b.s.
My mentor Horst Rechelbacher who created the Aveda empire started a organic beauty and wellness product line “Intelligent Nutrients” after selling Aveda to Este Lauder. It was his form of activism against the “loopholes” of organic labeling and “green washing”. It seems we are a culture of people less concerned with the health of the planet and more concerned with profit. Personally when I walk down the isle and see the green or black organic labeling I chuckle. Its becoming “knock off” consumerism everywhere we go in America. The only way to trust the true definition of organic is to… Read more »
Some valid concerns are brought up in this article, any specific fact-checkings aside. And I believe the author was well-intended, regardless. However, as co-manager of a small, diversified, direct-market family farm that is not certified, but goes well above and beyond the requirements, and as a parent and an environmentalist, I’m often concerned by articles like these. I worry that focusing so hard on the shortcomings of the industrial organic system paints a skewed picture to those less familiar with the complexities of the bigger picture and specifically the severity of the problems involved with the main alternative (industrial “conventional”).… Read more »
What about OMRI certifications and where is the industry at on organic hydroponics?