Trump Administration Rolls Back School Nutrition Standards
Ever since he took office, Donald Trump has made it a point to roll back as many of his predecessor’s policies as possible.
Trump Administration Rolls Back School Nutrition Standards
Ever since he took office, Donald Trump has made it a point to roll back as many of his predecessor’s policies as possible.
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, which is often attributed to both President Obama and Michelle Obama, instituted certain new reforms to the way the USDA administers school lunch programs. Rolling back those reforms has been a major thrust of the Trump administration and Trump’s USDA chief, Sonny Perdue. This week, the first of those rollbacks was announced.
The HHFK Act—we’re just abbreviating for the sake of ease, it isn’t usually referred to that way—was a multi-pronged effort to improve childhood nutrition. The best-known provisions included limiting milk to either one percent white or nonfat flavored milks; setting maximum limits for sodium, fat, and sugar; and minimum limits for fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. But it also instituted new funds and resources to help schools source more local produce, increased the number of eligible kids, increased access to water fountains, and cleaned up the way eligibility is run (by using census data rather than applications).
For years, Donald Trump has insisted that these rules are onerous and that more control should be given to the schools, which often operate under a strict and wildly inadequate budget. USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue has said that kids may simply be uninterested in healthy options, and that forcing schools to offer them is thus a waste of money and effort. (This is not, according to some studies, true; this study, for example, found that increasing access to healthy food does in fact increase the intake of healthy food.)
This week, the USDA released a press release outlining some of the new rules, saying the new rules are designed to “eliminate unnecessary regulatory burdens.” The first wave of these new rules include allowing flavored one-percent milk and freezing the sodium reduction requirements. Under the HHFK Act, schools were supposed to gradually reduce sodium content over the course of the decade. The new rules delay that by seven years, which could simply signal that those sodium goals may never actually be required.
The HHFK Act has, despite statements from the Trump administration, been a success; school lunch participation is up, long-term budgets don’t seem to be affected, and according to the USDA’s research, schools have reached near-universal compliance with the rules.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
December 21, 2018
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
USDA? how funny……that part of the swamp needs drained 😉 much better ideas for children’s lunch… that’s just my opinion tho’ 😉
It is wonderful that the Obama Administration implemented the guidelines mentioned. I am an advocate of good nutrition, and that is fresh fruit and vegetables (non GMO food), and nutritional supplements, however, it must start in the home, not in the school. If the children are taught one way in the home, they will follow that course in school, no matter how healthy. I do believe local control is better than big government.
Low sodium & low fat has been proven by repeatable independent science to not be healthy nutrition.
My mom and sister are both teachers and they hate the food served at the schools. They only improvement they saw was fresh fruit and vegetables that were offered more often but food quality overall went down and most students who’s parents could afford it started bringing thier own lunches. The students wouldn’t eat any of the bread products. As someone who is all about food and nutrition the fact the you try to restrict fat and salt but leave sugar in high amounts alone doesn’t make sense. Sugar and salt should be limited but fats in a diet are… Read more »
Have you ever seen a plate of what M.O. lunches were? I doubt a pig would have eaten them. Meanwhile her little darlings had a chef,so get off your soapbox about what they will be getting now. When they are children you feed them what they will eat ! Nuff said.
Nothing to add
No American would think that the federal government has any right to even opinion on school lunches. Schools are locally based & funded. Let us rural people, the REAL Americans back Trump (yes he is ass, so what!) to get the federal illegal over-reach out of our lives & back to Constitutional legality. the “success” of such perverse programs is not relevant. Nazi Concentration camps were “successful. Wrong is wrong.
Trump is narcissistic and needs to be removed .
Have you seen the pictures of these Obama era meals? Prisoners eat better. On top of that, the waste was through the roof, because students didn’t want the stuff offered.
The son of a bitch will do anything – anything – to restrict intellectual, medical, vocational and nutritive resources (and much more) available to the Common People, both to shovel more money to his bloated friends and to force the commoners into the military so that they can rape and pillage other countries for their resources – again, to satisfy the bloated Rich.