Fewer Eligible Immigrant Families Are Using SNAP
It’s easy to look at political bluster and judge it as such—just talk.
Fewer Eligible Immigrant Families Are Using SNAP
It’s easy to look at political bluster and judge it as such—just talk.
But it has real effects, as new research presented at the American Public Health Association’s 2018 annual meeting shows. The requirements for who is eligible to take advantage of SNAP, better known as food stamps, haven’t changed. But for the first time in a decade, fewer of those eligible for the program, especially recent immigrants, are enrolling.
Between 2007 and 2017, according to the APHA’s research, enrollment among those immigrant families who qualify for SNAP steadily raised. SNAP, which stands for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, has federal rules with some tweaks state by state. In general, individuals and households qualify if their income is below 130 percent of the federal poverty line; there are a bunch of other calculations which might vary by location involving what kinds of resources (cash, property, cars) are owned.
Non-citizen individuals are very rarely eligible for SNAP (and undocumented immigrants never are), but legal immigrants who have been in the country for more than five years are eligible if they fulfill the other requirements, even if their household includes someone who hasn’t been in the country long enough to be eligible. Households with children under the age of 18 can forego that five-year rule, and are eligible. This survey is not looking at fraud; everyone surveyed is legally entitled to these benefits. The question is: how many are actually using them?
Surveying 35,000 mothers of young children in Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, and Little Rock, the APHA found that between 2007 and 2017, enrollment for eligible families was steadily on the rise. By 2017, households with a mother who had been in the country for less than five years, but which had young children and were thus eligible, was up to 43 percent. For similarly eligible families with an immigrant mother who had been in the country for more than five years, that number hit 44.7 percent. It’s probably worth noting here that at its peak, fewer than half of some of the country’s neediest families were actually using the benefits they were legally entitled to. Immigrant families, in general, tend to use SNAP at much lower rates than American-born eligible families.
But in 2018, though there has been no change at all in the eligibility requirements, those numbers dropped dramatically. Families with a mother who came to the US fewer than five years ago went from 43 percent to 34.8 percent. Those with a mother who had been in the US for more than five years dropped from 44.7 to 42.7 percent. After a decade of steady increases, and with no legal reason for that not to continue, everything changed between 2017 and 2018.
Food insecurity hasn’t dropped among these families; in fact, it’s risen. The study’s lead researcher, Allison Bovell-Ammon, said in the press release, “We believe the drop in participation may be related to more nuanced changes in national immigration rhetoric and increased federal action to deport and detain immigrants. These findings demonstrate that rhetoric and the threat of policy changes, even before changes are enacted, may be causing families to forego nutrition assistance.”
Actions and rhetoric from the Republican Party, especially President Trump, have stoked fears that signing up for benefits—benefits that these people are legally entitled to—may cause them problems down the road. Proposed new rules from the Department of Homeland Security, following a leaked executive order plan from Trump, would view signing up for legal benefits as a mark against eventual citizenship. If passed, the rule would allow authorities to revoke legal resident status from those who had enrolled in benefit programs like SNAP.
Aside from being an abhorrent attack on the needy, there are plenty of economic arguments in favor of extending these sorts of benefits to immigrants; more on that here. But the tactics proposed by the Trump administration, judging by this APHA survey, seem to be working.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
November 27, 2018
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
The President is just doing his job. No need to slam him about that. Immigrants are not supposed to be public charges.
Good news. Fewer illegal aliens are using Snap. Thank you President Trump. Give the benefits to true American homeless and veterans.
Thanks to President Trump for doing what is in the best interest of America. I believe our Canadian neighbors to the north do not provide SNAP type funds for immigrants. I dont understand why we are so critical. You also want a balanced budget for our country. Any good ideas on how to do this when so many hands are out for government money. Which way do you want it?
Stop all the freebies and the illegal numbers will drop. I’m personally sick and tires of working and paying huge taxes to cover everyone’s asses in not just this country but the world. 68 and still working plus 40 hrs.per week.
‘
So under Obama, food stamps went up, under Trump food stamps go down. Thank you Trump for creating jobs.