Study Finds That Long-Banned Pesticides Linked to Higher Risk of Autism
They’ve been gone for 40 years, and still making trouble.
But a new study from Drexel University indicates that that might not be the case. Older readers may remember the infamous pesticide DDT, which was banned in 1972, ten years after the publication of Rachel Carson’s seminal book Silent Spring, which detailed the many ways in which DDT was ravaging the environment. (The pesticide might be most infamous for very nearly pushing the bald eagle to extinction.)
DDT is a member of a group of pesticides known as organochlorines, all of which were banned at that same time. In the same general family are polychlorinated biphenyls, usually abbreviated to PCBs, which throughout the 20th century were produced as a byproduct of various manufactured goods and, frequently, dumped directly into such important waterways as the Great Lakes and the Hudson River.
The new study found a distinct correlation between babies who tested positive for higher levels of certain organochlorines and PCBs and the likelihood that those babies will later be diagnosed with autism and/or intellectual disability. In fact, those children who tested at the highest levels of particular organochlorines were about 80 percent more likely to be diagnosed with autism than those who tested at the lowest level (or presented no organochlorines at all). The organochlorine p,p’DDE, formed by the breakdown of DDT, was found to be correlated with increased risk of intellectual disability.
The study is fairly simple, though it uses data that hasn’t been put together in quite this way before. Some children born in the past few decades were given blood tests in their second trimester, and those blood tests will show the presence of these chemicals in the fetus. Comparing that data with autism spectrum diagnoses (and a control group from the general population) yields the results.
In case you’re wondering, organochlorines are widely known to have not really decomposed in the past 40 years; they seeped into groundwater, were absorbed by plants, and can sometimes be found in the fats of livestock that we eat today.
Nobody is saying these pesticides cause autism; only that a higher level of them has a correlation with higher rates of autism.
The caveats for this study are important. For one thing, this is absolutely a correlation; nobody is saying these pesticides cause autism or intellectual disability, only that a higher level of them has a correlation with higher rates. And the sample size is small, relying on less than 1,500 cases, all from Southern California, and all of whom had enrolled in a specific program that administered those blood tests. Even further, the study adjusted for some variables – gender, time of birth, maternal age and ethnic identification – but not others, like socioeconomic status, location, or family medical history.
That said, of course, the study indicates – not proves, but indicates – just how damaging pesticides and toxic byproducts might be in the environment and in generations still to come. Even if they’ve been banned for almost half a century.
Correction: An earlier version of this article contained errors about the precise connection between certain chemicals and their specific correlations. We apologize for this mistake.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
August 26, 2016
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.