No-Till Practices Can Help Boost Farmland Value
Even small changes can make a big difference.
No-Till Practices Can Help Boost Farmland Value
Even small changes can make a big difference.
No-till farming, a technique long known to save farmers time, resources and dollars, is now shown to actually add value to the land on which it’s practiced.
According to a new study by North Carolina State University, the practice of no-till farming can increase agricultural land value. Researchers found that just a one-percent increase in no-till farming can equate to a $7.86-per-acre increase in land value in Midwestern states, where the study was focused.
When researchers honed in on Iowa only, they found no-till farming could have an impact on land value to the tune of $14.75 per acre.
Conventional tilling practices involve farmers making multiple passes over a field, first to till the soil and then to plant seeds. By contrast, no-till practices eliminate the first step, and farmers plant seeds in fields without tilling. As a result, the land is left with crop residue after harvest. No-till farming is considered the more environmentally friendly option, as it requires less fuel and soil disturbance. The research showed that untilled land has lower rates of soil erosion and less nutrient runoff when compared to conventionally tilled land.
Currently, around 37 percent of farms use no-till techniques across the US, including “strong adoption rates in the Northeast, the mid-Atlantic states and the Midwest,” the study found.
The financial and time-saving benefits of no-till farming is not new information—according to a 2021 USDA report, a farmer’s switch to a no-till process on a 1,000-acre swath of land can save roughly $8,500 in fuel annually and eliminate nearly 67 hours worth of work per pass over the field. But this study is the first to put a dollar amount on the value no-till farming can add back to the land.
“This study suggests that farmland benefits translate into land value benefits, which is typically not considered in debates on no-till pros and cons, and, ultimately, whether or not conventional-till farmers should convert to no-till practices,” said Rod Rejesus, professor of agricultural and resource economics at NC State and corresponding author of the paper, in describing the research.
To conduct the research, the team compared data sets from census survey responses that asked farmers in more than 12 Midwestern states about the market value of their land. They then combined the land value data with satellite-based data on the prominence of no-till farming practices in the same states.
The team also used the same process and data sets from Iowa to get a direct picture of how the results play out in the state of Iowa alone.
The plan in the future is to apply the same research technique to other parts of the country to see how they compare to the results in the Midwest.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Shea Swenson, Modern Farmer
September 11, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
No-Till is an answer to tillage if you ignore its shortcomings in converting existing growing plant populations to another crop. How do you kill a growing pasture that has passed its prime? Either you disk or use alternate soil disturbing practices or spray the vegetation into a mass of brown toxic vegetable matter. No-Till works great with barren land which has lost its ability to regenerate itself and depends upon copious amounts of artificial nitrogen sources and minerals. If indeed carbon dioxide is the problem it is purported, vibrant green plant populations are an answer to sequester this problem gas… Read more »
But it requires more chemical use
Great idea to quantify added value of sustainable and regenerative practices, but these numbers seem to be based solely on owners’ self-appraisal. Isn’t there any hard data, from land brokers, for instance? And how about the added value of increased soil moisture and organic matter measurements?
This is rather obvious, but the quantification is nice to see.
It’s North Carolina State University. There is also a University of North Carolina. But there is not a North Carolina University.
Cool article. A very practical, no-nonsense way to demonstrate the economic benefit of no-till farming. What better incentive do you need?
Good day, what can you say about no-tilling farming in a tropical country like Philippines ? Is it possible ? Thank you
Currently, I am proposing a research about “Contributing to Sustainable Farmland in the Philippines” can you help me about important facts or research if the ‘no tilling’ farming is possible and ideal in a tropical country?