Mormon Crickets Swarm Oregon Farms
Officials are fighting infestations of the cannibalistic insect.
Mormon Crickets Swarm Oregon Farms
Officials are fighting infestations of the cannibalistic insect.
The chirps of crickets heard among grasslands isn’t necessarily a relaxing summer night sound for ranchers and farmers. For those located in the West, it could be a sign of a disastrous infestation of Mormon crickets, a pest currently ransacking crops and grasslands of Oregon in record-breaking numbers.
Mormon crickets are not truly crickets—and certainly not Mormon—but instead are flightless, short-winged katydids with shield-backs that got their name when swarms of them decimated crop fields of Mormon settlers in Utah in the 1800s.
The ravenous insects, which can devastate cultivated crops such as wheat, barley, corn and alfalfa, can also cause huge monetary setbacks to livestock producers by rendering grassland barren for their herd and forcing the farmers to buy supplemental feed.
Populations bolstered by years of ongoing drought coupled with mild winters in the western United States have allowed for an abundance of the insect’s eggs to thrive and hatch. Now, Mormon crickets are all but overtaking massive acreage of farmland in Oregon. In 2021 alone, the crickets led to the damage of a record-breaking 10 million acres of Oregon farmland, the worst outbreak in 50 years.
According to the Associated Press, the Oregon Legislature spent $5 million on a suppression program for the pests in 2021, a fund to which it added $1.2 million this month in the face of the continued outbreak.
The bugs can grow to be larger than two inches long. Despite being unable to fly, the crickets are still capable of traveling long distances and instead move by walking or jumping in huge swarms—think millions or billions of insects. As if the size and spread of the crawlers isn’t creepy enough, their behavior is just as alarming. The crickets are cannibalistic and will eat members of their own species—dead or alive—if they need the extra protein intake.
Existing programs to mitigate the infestations of the crickets along with grasshoppers rely on chemical sprays to kill the bugs off. The programs operate at both state and federal levels, with the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) supporting grasshopper and Mormon cricket suppression in Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming, in addition to Oregon.
Oregon’s current program allows farmers and ranchers to request a land survey. If surveyors from the Oregon Department of Agriculture find more than three of the crickets per square yard or land, they recommend treatment with a spray of diflubenzuron—an insecticide that inhibits growth and causes bugs to die during molting. This means, however, that once the bugs reach maturity, they are no longer treatable with the chemical spray.
Through the Oregon program, landowners of the treated property are eligible for upwards of 75 percent reimbursement for the cost of the treatment. APHIS also offers payment assistance programs for treatment spray of private lands and covers 100 percent of the cost on federal owned acreage.
But not everyone agrees with the spraying. In fact, environmentalist groups are suing the Biden administration for sprays across western states including Oregon, Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, reports Herald and News, on the basis that the chemicals can harm other wildlife and the government failed to follow proper procedures surrounding the land treatment.
Andrew Missel, staff attorney at Advocates for the West, which is representing the Center for Biological Diversity and the Portland-based Xerces Society in the federal lawsuit, told Herald and News: “In APHIS‘s telling, its program magically affects only grasshoppers [and crickets], and only as much as necessary. But that’s not how pesticides work; blanketing hundreds of thousands or even millions of acres of rangelands with broad-scale pesticides kills bees, butterflies, moths, beetles and other vital species, and threatens to further impair ecosystems already suffering from the effects of drought and climate change.”
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Shea Swenson, Modern Farmer
July 2, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
I have definitely heard more crickets than usual lately (Lane and Douglas Co areas) but haven’t seen swarms. There HAS to be another solution other than the spray that is likely to harm other wildlife. Other cultures catch, roast, and eat crickets and cicadas, or feed them to their animals.
Around HELIX Oregon, there are no Mormon crickets here. It is an insult to say Oregon, if this is only Western Oregon. I plan to see 100 bushels an acre wheat in Umatilla County, Oregon, this year. Our wheat goes to Japan for pastry products mostly. Give me the counties of this infestation of bugs, please. I am contacting, Dan Ball, doctor of weed and bug science, retired, from OSU. I am sorry, but preppernurse1 on youtube said Oregon crops are at risk from these Mormon crickets: I intend to disprove this for my town.