Researchers Find Chickens Fed A Green Diet Are Just as Tasty
It tastes just like chicken!
Researchers Find Chickens Fed A Green Diet Are Just as Tasty
It tastes just like chicken!
Most poultry producers in the United States have been able to optimize their farms’ productivity by fattening up their chickens with conventional soy-based feeds. While this kind of feed is relatively inexpensive, it’s not great for the environment.
There are some more eco-friendly alternative feeds, but they tend to be more expensive and there has been some question in the past over whether they affect the taste of the birds they’re fed to. But new research has found that chickens fed two specific eco-friendly alternatives taste just like… chicken!
A new study, conducted by German scientists and published in the Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture, analyzed the meat of three groups of chickens: Some that were fed black soldier fly larvae, others that were given spirulina algae, and a third group that was fed a conventional soybean diet. They compared the taste, texture, odor and color of the meat and found that for the most part, the chickens fed the alternative diets didn’t taste that differently from those that ate the conventional feed.
Researchers did notice that the larvae-fed chicken had less of an “adhesive texture” when they were chewing the meat, but the taste didn’t differ much. And the algae-fed birds even had a stronger, savory chicken flavor.
Brianne Altmann, the lead author of the study at Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, says the recent report is one of the first to outline a “full sensory profile” of chicken meat.
“Think a little bit about how a wine is described on the bottle. This is what we achieved with the meat—we can fully describe the eating experience,” she says. “The good news is, is that the feed source only marginally changes the sensory profile, and when the profile changes, [it’s] for the better.”
As far as how the meat looked, researchers found that the eco-friendly fed chicken differed when it was uncooked from the usual packaged chicken we get at grocery stores. Larvae-fed chicken meat had a slightly yellow tint and the algae raised counterpart had a very distinct orange hue. The panel of tasters did not notice this as the color faded when the meat was cooked, but researchers say the difference could deter consumers from buying the product. Larvae-fed chicken meat also had a higher fatty acid content then the other two samples. However, past research shows that feeding those flies a different diet can alter the amount of fat in the chicken.
As the global consumption rates for meat continue to climb, researchers say that having other feed options that aren’t produced on arable land would be a beneficial addition. Currently, about a third of the world’s farmland is dedicated to crops grown for livestock feed.
In its report on Livestock Solutions for Climate Change, the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization found that livestock producers are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than most other food sources. And the cultivation of soybeans, a key protein ingredient in feeds for chicken, hogs and cows, has been a key culprit for deforestation in the Amazon basin. An additional study this year showed that soybeans grown and exported from Brazil were responsible for 223 metric million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions over a five-year period.
“Giving consumers options will change our future food systems,” Altmann says.
She adds that getting farmers onboard with alternative feeds might be challenging given their cost. Growing algae can be expensive. In the US, some farms, like Enviroflight, have started producing feed with a larvae-based protein. Although algae or larvae feeds are not yet considered to be a widespread trend in agriculture, Altmann says that it’s likely that these types of alternative diets will first land in aquaculture due to the promise they have shown.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Lindsay Campbell, Modern Farmer
July 26, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
Interesting the concern whether consumers would buy chicken with a yellow or orange tint, as Perdue was famous for adding marigold to its feed and marketing the chicken based on the healthy yellow color.
I am also incredulous that flies would be more expensive than soy. Surely just a temporary supply and demand problem exacerbated by soy subsidies. A follow up study on fly larvae production costs and enviro impact compared to soy would be interesting. Thanks for the reporting!
I feel that a varied diet is best. I raise larvae of the black soldier fly in compost bins, which the chickens are totally crazy about, then feed them some grains and greens every day. The greens are mostly from vegetables that are near the end of production or grasses. So nothing goes to waste and I only buy the grains.
Technology adaptations and innovation are necessary for advancing productivity in poultry production. In Africa, the huge market is still not satisfied as the youth are exempted from employment opportunities in poultry production and Agricultural Value-Chain Technology for Industrial Development. It will therefore be great for investors to partner enterprises to create clusters for emergence of SMEs for Industrial development for offshore markets.
Kienyeji chickens
Yes
Oh yes, you know what’s also bad for environment? Eating animals.