Funny; here in WC Wisconsin we now have soil sample deficiencies in sulfur.
James Pagel
4 years ago
This is a disappointing and untruthful article… There is no direct correlation between coal plants and crop production..
Sorry, extremely deceptive
Teresa G Fleener
4 years ago
For the folks that question this graphic, a quick lesson. Sulphur in the soil is not the same as sulfur in the air. Sulfur in the air that lands on the foliage of the plants is essentially sulfuric acid. That is what causes the damage to the plants. This can be seen with satellite data using infrared analysis. Hopefully Dr. Wendel will be able to ground proof her work by following up with the farmers or the extension agents. Coal plants, particularly the high sulfur coal on the east coast, are bad news for everyone.
jim
4 years ago
I wonder about this article…………too.
Billy
4 years ago
Sounds like a bunch of made of bs.
Ljb
4 years ago
10.2 billion is more than 30 bu per acre for all corn soybeans wheat and sorghum acres. Seems very high.
Ryan
4 years ago
Our soils in Ohio are sulphur deficient and we must feed our crop additional sulphur costing us more money. Not buying this premise at all.
Oliver
4 years ago
Ummm ……….more likely rain and availability of nitrogen. As a master gardener and home horticulture guy I’m thinking that shutting coal plants is great and all, but this flyer presents its data more like a convenient correlation and its causation is a stretch.
Please have all weedkiller chemicals as killing our environment wildlife species animal’s creatures living in the flower area to protect our endangered species animal’s in the wild please have all the oil materials plus please help our rainforests around the world to stop illegal logging that is illegal happen in the important rainforests please finds the peoples harming our importance rainforests where the endangered species animal’s who play an big part in the environmental please help them to be round in the environmental to help us to fight have a better future in the environmental thank you
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
Funny; here in WC Wisconsin we now have soil sample deficiencies in sulfur.
This is a disappointing and untruthful article… There is no direct correlation between coal plants and crop production..
Sorry, extremely deceptive
For the folks that question this graphic, a quick lesson. Sulphur in the soil is not the same as sulfur in the air. Sulfur in the air that lands on the foliage of the plants is essentially sulfuric acid. That is what causes the damage to the plants. This can be seen with satellite data using infrared analysis. Hopefully Dr. Wendel will be able to ground proof her work by following up with the farmers or the extension agents. Coal plants, particularly the high sulfur coal on the east coast, are bad news for everyone.
I wonder about this article…………too.
Sounds like a bunch of made of bs.
10.2 billion is more than 30 bu per acre for all corn soybeans wheat and sorghum acres. Seems very high.
Our soils in Ohio are sulphur deficient and we must feed our crop additional sulphur costing us more money. Not buying this premise at all.
Ummm ……….more likely rain and availability of nitrogen. As a master gardener and home horticulture guy I’m thinking that shutting coal plants is great and all, but this flyer presents its data more like a convenient correlation and its causation is a stretch.
Please have all weedkiller chemicals as killing our environment wildlife species animal’s creatures living in the flower area to protect our endangered species animal’s in the wild please have all the oil materials plus please help our rainforests around the world to stop illegal logging that is illegal happen in the important rainforests please finds the peoples harming our importance rainforests where the endangered species animal’s who play an big part in the environmental please help them to be round in the environmental to help us to fight have a better future in the environmental thank you