Ban of Neonicotinoids in UK Cost Farmers Millions
But we still don’t know if the ban had any direct effect on honeybee populations.
Ban of Neonicotinoids in UK Cost Farmers Millions
But we still don’t know if the ban had any direct effect on honeybee populations.
But landing on a definitive cause-and-effect between pesticides and honeybee die-off is proving to be nothing if not ridiculously difficult. Since December 2013, the European Union has banned the use of three types of neonicotinoid pesticides, believing – thanks to a number of studies – that they were responsible for large-scale honeybee demise. Neonicotinoids are very chemically similar to nicotine and, while less harmful to mammals and birds, are toxic to insects. At least one study has determined bees (including honeybees) are actually attracted to neonicotinoids, much like humans who can’t stop smoking.
When the EU banned these types of pesticides, there was no system put in place to assess whether the ban would have a measurable impact on honeybee populations. A pan-European study on honeybee mortality covering the years 2012 to 2014 was conducted, but according to an email from a representative of the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, it wasn’t designed to determine if there was a correlation between the honeybee numbers and to what extent pesticide use – rather than other factors like diseases, winter temperature, or bad beekeeping practices – was the cause.
That said, there was a noticeable decrease in overwintering colony mortality rates in 2013 to 2014 across Europe as compared with 2012 to 2013, but in some areas, the mortality rate remains high. The data continues to be analyzed and interpreted, according to the European Commission, which admits in the report that there needs to be more in-depth studies into the problem.
“The only conclusion you could draw from this [pan-European] study is that it is not pesticides alone [that is responsible for bee deaths],” a representative of the European Commission tells Modern Farmer in an email. (We were asked to not specifically name this rep.)
England and Wales had the second highest overwintering mortality rate for 2012 to 2013 in all of Europe (29.3 percent), just behind Belgium – but because no data was provided by England and Wales the following year (no explanation was given in the report why they didn’t participate the second year), there’s no way of comparing those numbers with 2013 to 2014, based on this study. But an entirely separate 11-year study in England and Wales, released this August, found there was, in fact, a measurable correlation between honeybee mortality and an increased use of these neonicotinoid pesticides.
To make matters even more confusing, the United Kingdom partially lifted the ban on two of these pesticides this past July for 120 days, allowing their use on about 5 percent of England’s rapeseed crop on farms in Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire, and Hertfordshire. The National Farmers’ Union of England and Wales (NFU) had earlier done an “emergency application” of the chemicals on rapeseed crops there. (Rapeseed is used as both a biofuel and a common cooking oil; it’s often simply labeled vegetable oil or canola oil.)
This comes after yet another recent study, published by Rural Business Research, found that the ban has cost U.K. farmers millions by forcing them to use alternate chemicals to fight off cabbage stem flea beetle, a major crop pest of rapeseed. The RBR study stated that the financial costs to farmers was nearly £22 million ($33 million U.S.) for alternative pesticide use, lost crops, and replanting costs.
“This is the ultimate example of a dodgy dossier,” British beekeeper David Sturgess told the Western Morning News. “The NFU cannot contradict the scientific finding that ‘neonics’ kill our already endangered bees so they have hidden behind the suggestion that the use of ‘neonics’ reduces their need to spray yet more insecticides. This assumes that we’re all stupid and can be easily duped.”
The nonprofit Friends of the Earth, calling the British government’s lifting of the neonicotinoid ban “unnecessary, unlawful and harmful,” is asking that country’s highest court for a judicial review of the decision, according to The Guardian newspaper.
There are currently very few restrictions on these pesticides in the United States where neonicotinoids are extremely common, but there are a number of grassroots efforts to have the pesticides banned. Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will phase out neonicotinoid use on the 150 million acres it manages across the country by January 2016.
The EU’s ban is up for review at the end of the year. Hopefully, the European Commission will carry through with plans to dig deeper into bee mortality and land on a more definitive explanation for their diminished numbers.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Andrew Amelinckx, Modern Farmer
September 11, 2015
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.