Pig Tech: Improving Pork’s Future
In a quest to eliminate gestation crates, researches believe they’ve cracked the code that may make open pens a widespread reality for swine across the country.
Pig Tech: Improving Pork’s Future
In a quest to eliminate gestation crates, researches believe they’ve cracked the code that may make open pens a widespread reality for swine across the country.
This might make him sound like a romantic, but don’t let his language fool you – his company’s path is firmly rooted in practicality. He’s adopted new technology developed at the University of Pennsylvania that may make open pens a widespread reality for swine across the country. The new feeding system is the result of a collaboration between researchers, animal welfare experts, and a high-tech “seed” bank dedicated to rare breeds. They aren’t just trying to build a better feeding model – they’re trying to build a better pig. And they’re banking on the invention making farmers’ lives easier, too.
Gestation crates or stalls are metal cages about seven feet by two feet wide that became popular about 40 years ago. The crates house breeding sows that are inseminated and give birth to feeder pigs approximately every five months. Those feeder pigs are what consumers eat. The use of such crates, which many believe are inhumane, have been contentiously debated. Recently, hipster-heartthrob Ryan Gosling penned an op-ed in The Globe and Mail decrying the practice.
Dr. Thomas Parsons, who leads the Swine Teaching and Research Center at the University of Pennsylvania, grew up on a pig farm. He’s seen crates used firsthand. Pigs can get testy when feeding, and will bully each other out of meals, so crates were introduced as a way to get food reliably to every pig. But welfare advocates argue that not only are crates cramped, they deprive pigs, who are sociable animals, of much-needed pig quality time. Parsons is no stranger to the argument.
During post-doctoral work in Germany in the mid-90s, Parsons saw a changing attitude toward farming in Europe. “At that point the Europeans were getting much more interested in some of these questions of animal welfare and sow housing, and I think that just sensitized me to some of those issues,” said Parsons. The European Union banned gestation crates, beginning this year.
Thus, the groundwork was laid for Parsons to begin studying open pen models. He started developing what he calls the “Penn” Gestation Housing and Electronic Feeding System in the early 2000s, based on methods he saw in Europe. His research has recently received funding from the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Pig Improvement Company (PIC), an organization devoted to genetic improvement in pigs and the animal “seed bank,” the SVF foundation.
Here’s how it works: Parsons’ model has “essentially eliminated the competition for feed,” he said. Each pig has a radio frequency tag attached to her ear and is fed depending on her nutritional needs. A 17-foot-long enclosed station is set up in the barn that allows one pig access at a time. A sow walks in setting off a motion detector that signals the system to close the door behind her. She walks toward a feeding station where her RFID (radio-frequency identification) tag is read and a bowl swings out and her food is released. Once the sow is finished she is trained to head to the other side of the feeding system and back into the barn. (Farmers say the training process isn’t so tough – the pigs naturally want to return to the barn after eating.) All of the data is controlled by a computer system managed by the farmer. When the pigs aren’t feeding, they’re left to roam.
Parsons analyzes data with a farmer who uses his system
Pig emerging from the Penn system
A farmer using the identification technology
What could be better than a better pig feeding system? How about a better pig to go with it. That’s where the SVF Foundation comes in. Nestled in the bucolic green hills of Newport, Rhode Island, this high-tech organization is on a quest to save rare and heritage farm animals. They collect embryos and sperm from vanishing varieties of sheep, cows and other animals, and store them using state-of-the art cryopreservation. The hope is that if a rare breed approaches extinction they can jumpstart the bloodline. Think of it as “Jurassic Park” for farm animals. They also breed livestock on their grounds. When the foundation heard of Parsons’ work, they got in touch and made a suggestion: what if they could breed a pig naturally suited to open pen life?
“For years we’ve been breeding pigs to be really big and aggressive because they were housed in individual stalls, and so we wanted them to eat a lot and grow as fast as they could,” said Sarah Bowley, the program and livestock manager at SVF.
With funding from the foundation, Parsons is now working with SVF to find the genetics that make a sow more conducive to open pen living, perhaps a less aggressive, more mothering sow. Once those traits are identified, pigs will be selectively bred to encourage them.
Finding the perfect balance will be tricky. “There’s probably going to have to be some in-between, unfortunately the heritage breeds aren’t as productive as the other breeds, which is, of course, why they weren’t chosen for mainstream production,” said Bowley.
Ultimately, genetics may be just part of the perfect pigpen, according to Parsons. Diversity, training and advancements in the system itself will also play role, he said.
Right now, of course, most farmers can choose to use gestation crates or not. But that may be changing – around sixty companies, including McDonald’s and Burger King have committed to eliminating gestation stalls from their supply chain and nine states have already banned gestation crates. Parsons’ and the SVF Foundation’s work may have arrived at a timely turning point. In the meantime, Parsons thinks there are enough advantages to his system that some farmers will adopt it voluntarily. For instance, the system can be told to dole out individual meal amounts to each pig, mark pigs with a sprayer to remind farmers to administer a vaccine or usher pigs post-feeding through a special exit if they need to be isolated for special treatment. The cost of installing the system is on par with existing ones.
“The technology itself will allow us to do things, in terms of how we care for sows, that we couldn’t do in the conventional system,” said Parsons. “So we see it ultimately as a tool to move the industry forward.”
For now the current system has proved to be scalable and will be in place in 50 farms by year’s end, with an estimate of 100,000 sows in the “Penn” Gestation Housing and Electronic Feeding System. Parsons is also seeing international interest in the open pen models. A year ago he visited Brazil to guide those in the pork industry on transitioning over to open pen. Agricultural leaders from China — the world’s largest consumer of pork — have also trained in the facility and have implemented some of the practices at farms back home.
Parsons’ quest is by no means an easy one — he’s trying to balance the demands of farmers, animal welfare advocates, and consumers. So far, he thinks he’s been successful.
“We don’t want to be seen as an agent of change. We are simply a solution when people want to make the change,” he said. “It’s a very funny time. And how people tend to react to this is challenging. That’s the world I live in.”
As for Bob Ruth of Country View Family Farms he says “he would never throw the gestation crate under the bus.” But “if we can give them the same care and let them move around, why wouldn’t you do that?”
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Gloria Dawson, Modern Farmer
July 23, 2013
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.