Why Perdue Going Organic Could Mean Cleaner Water
Why one of the nation’s largest chicken producers is willing to go organic for the sake of cleaner water.
Why Perdue Going Organic Could Mean Cleaner Water
Why one of the nation’s largest chicken producers is willing to go organic for the sake of cleaner water.
The company, based in Salisbury, Md., is still growing most of its organic chickens in Pennsylvania, which is home to Coleman Natural, the organic grower Perdue purchased in 2011. But with demand strong, Perdue is looking to expand its organic and no-antibiotics offerings.
If it does, it may well look to the 1,100 growers on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, where Arthur Perdue began selling eggs nearly 100 years ago. That move could prompt Big Chicken’s other large companies, Tyson’s and Pilgrim’s Pride, to offer more organic choices. And although organic growing standards have little to do with water quality, raising chickens differently could be good for the streams and rivers that often bisect poultry farms.
Those include some of the nation’s most troubled rivers, among them the Potomac as it courses through West Virginia and an Illinois River that is choking on pollution from poultry operations in Arkansas. The excess pollution from chicken manure has fueled algae blooms in the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico, and is partly responsible for the large swaths of dead zones on both those bodies of water – areas of low or no-oxygen where few critters can live. It is also partly to blame for a recent increase in Lake Erie’s pollution; things have gotten so bad there that the state has put the lake on a phosphorus diet.
Local environmental groups like to blame leaking wastewater plants and unsavory development practices for the sorry state of many waterways. But the truth is that farming is often the culprit. Agriculture is the largest source of pollution to the Chesapeake Bay, and manure is the largest source of agricultural pollution. The EPA estimates that manure accounts for 19 percent of the nitrogen and 26 percent of the phosphorus entering the Chesapeake. That’s one of the highest concentrations in the nation, but others are not far behind, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s recent farm census. Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin have high concentrations of chickens, as do Alabama, the Carolinas and the area along the Texas-Oklahoma border.
Agriculture is the largest source of pollution to the Chesapeake Bay, and manure is the largest source of agricultural pollution.
The Chesapeake Bay remains so vulnerable to agricultural runoff because the lands that make up its Eastern shore are flat, and the water table is low. But every part of the country that grows chickens could be soon counting high phosphorus levels. That’s because of the three-legged stool of Big Chicken.
It works like this: Contract chicken growers raise thousands of birds in long, narrow chicken houses. When the flock is grown, workers clean out their manure from the chicken houses, and farmers apply the manure to nearby grain farms. The manure fertilizes the corn, which is ground into feed for the chickens. The chicken farmer picks up the feed to nourish a new flock, and the process begins again.
So the first leg is raising the birds, the second is applying their waste to fields that grow corn, and the third is grinding that corn into chicken feed for the birds.
Those three legs have meant work in an area where jobs are hard to find: Work for the chicken growers, the staff at the grain elevators, the cleanout crews, the grain farmers and the agronomy consultants. It means that farmers who have manure don’t have to buy expensive, petroleum-based fertilizers, and chicken farmers without any crops have another commodity to sell. It’s been great for Salisbury, which has transformed from a sleepy town into a relatively cosmopolitan city, with a first-rate university that includes many buildings named for Perdue. And it’s meant that the land in Maryland, much of it a commutable distance from Washington, D.C., has remained agricultural instead of turning into more houses.
But there has been a price to pay. In 2012, those Maryland poultry farms generated 332,000 tons of manure, according to the Maryland Department of Agriculture. The bulk of it remained on Maryland’s jangly Shore peninsula, feeding the three-legged stool – fertilizer for corn and grain that feed chickens, which in turn generate waste as they grow, which is destined to be applied to fields and make yet more corn that will be milled into chicken feed.
In the process, manure becomes an ingredient in the toxic soup. Manure runoff, along with stormwater, excess pollution from sewage and leaking septic tanks, has fueled algae blooms, led to high counts of fecal coliform, and contributed to low-oxygen conditions in the waterways.
Many Marylanders decry the pollution, but hold a soft spot for the farmers. In 2010, the Waterkeeper Alliance sued Perdue and one of its growers, Alan Hudson, accusing them of polluting a tributary of the Pocomoke River via a pile of chicken manure. The pile wasn’t manure – it was biosolids, or treated human waste – and the lawsuit unraveled. A judge ruled for Perdue and Hudson in 2012.
Post-Hudson, manure remains a problem in the Chesapeake and elsewhere. Farmers apply manure to meet their nitrogen needs, which means they almost always over-apply phosphorus. That’s because the ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus is not consistent with the crops’ production needs, according to Royden Powell III, assistant secretary of the Maryland Department of Agriculture.
For decades, the science indicated that phosphorus would stay put. Today, Powell said, agronomists know that not only can phosphorus run off the land, but it can also travel through sub-surface pathways.
To address that, Maryland authorities want to roll out new regulations that would limit the phosphorus farmers could apply to their fields. Under the new parameters, half the farms on Maryland’s Eastern Shore would exceed those limits. The phosphorus rules have been delayed three times because of farmer protests, and will be delayed again because of another new law requiring an economic study.
While the state waits, the concentrations of phosphorus are increasing in many Maryland rivers running through Chicken Country. Researchers who work on phosphorus issues have noted that the process of setting limits is challenging everywhere. Rarely, though, has it become as political as it has in Maryland, where a decade of wrangling over limits still hasn’t led to any firm ones.
It’s important to focus on what the birds eat, not what comes out the other end.
Intuitively, the organic-means-less-manure theory seems correct because organic chickens do grow more slowly, said Russ Brinsfield, director of the University of Maryland’s Center for Agro-Ecology and a farmer himself. But it hasn’t been studied; the organic standards, Brinsfield said, focus on what the birds eat, not what comes out the other end. Other factors in reducing the manure burden include raising chickens in less confined quarters, diversifying an operation to include eggs and changing the feed to something less corn-intensive.
More organic production could mean less airborne pesticides and herbicides. But, Brinsfield said, Perdue is moving in this direction because of its bottom line.
“They see this as an emerging market, and they’re trying to capitalize on it.”
Anything that reduces the amount of manure would be a positive for America’s poultry-producing regions. A robust organic operation would not knock over Big Chicken’s three-legged stool, but it might at least hobble it.
Rona Kobell is a staff writer for the Chesapeake Bay Journal and co-producer of the monthly show Midday on the Bay on WYPR radio.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Rona Kobell, Modern Farmer
August 15, 2014
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.