Germany Says ‘Nein!’ to Chlorine Chickens From the U.S.
In Germany, there is widespread opposition to one little-known processing technique: the use of chlorine to wash chickens after slaughter.
Germany Says ‘Nein!’ to Chlorine Chickens From the U.S.
In Germany, there is widespread opposition to one little-known processing technique: the use of chlorine to wash chickens after slaughter.
The object of their disapproval was a giant poultry slaughterhouse ”“ one of the largest in Europe ”“ and their aim was formidable: to demand a fundamental change in agricultural practice prior to Germany’s federal elections in September.
“We’ve come here,” said Astrid Goltz, an activist with an organization called CAMPACT who attended the march, “to say that we want farmers instead of agricultural factories.”
Germany, as a European Union member state, is currently negotiating a massive free trade agreement with the United States estimated to be worth 120 billion euros (or 163 billion dollars) a year. The deal, formally called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (or TTIP), has prompted pockets of protests against all the usual suspects: genetically modified foods, animal hormone treatments. In Germany, it has also sparked a remarkably widespread and staunch opposition to one specific and little-known processing technique: the use of chlorine to wash chickens after slaughter. The process has even engendered its own vocabulary, and Das ChlorhÁ¼nchen ”“ chlorine chicken ”“ is now a household word.
By now it’s history that the protesters lost their ostensible election wishes ”“ Angela Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats retained their majority in Parliament. But as the rallying cries of an exceptionally engaged (and well-clothed) public have gained volume, even the conservative government has made baldly protectionist promises to the German farming sector.
Das ChlorhÁ¼nchen ”“ chlorine chicken ”“ is now a household word.
“There will be no imports of ChlorhÁ¼nchen from America,” Chancellor Merkel proclaimed in May. “It’s something that I’ve prevented for years, and I will continue to prevent it. No question.”
Her message dovetailed with a media bombardment that pegged ChlorhÁ¼nchen as the symbol of anti-TTIP sentiment. The newspaper SÁ¼ddeutsche Zeitung named it the “emblematic animal of the chlorine choir”, and Der Spiegel less subtly headlined the whole affair ‘ChlorhÁ¼nchen im Shitstorm;’ no translation required.
In fact, there has been a Europe-wide ban on U.S. poultry since 1997, and the issue has been subjected to challenge via the World Trade Organization (WTO). A WTO panel, requested by the outgoing Bush administration in January 2009, was set up in November of the same year but has yet to begin. Prior to the ban, according to the U.S. Congressional Research Service, exports of broiler meat and turkey to the EU were valued at 58 million dollars ”“ so the potential market at stake is not insignificant.
The prospects of reaching an agreement have become even dimmer of late, as the USDA is set to incorporate new guidelines later this year that will make the use of chlorine in chicken processing even more prevalent (they will also speed up processing lines and reduce the number of inspectors, but that’s another fish to fry).
At the heart of both sides’ arguments is an appeal to science, with varying views toward the exact delimitations of science’s application: officials in the U.S. argue that the treated poultry itself doesn’t pose a health risk, while the EU advocates for a consideration of the entire process ”“ including environmental factors and humane animal treatment.
The European Food Safety Authority has basically agreed with the claim of U.S. officials, publishing a report that found no significant safety concern associated with the application of four antimicrobial solutions (acidified sodium chlorite, chlorine dioxide, trisodium phosphate and peroxyacids). Nevertheless, they stressed that washing chickens with the solutions, “does not replace the need for good hygienic practices during the processing of poultry carcasses.”
Der Spiegel headlined the whole affair ‘ChlorhÁ¼nchen im Shitstorm;’ no translation required.
This speaks to Germans’ antipathy toward ChlorhÁ¼nchen, at root of which is the idea that dunking a chicken into a vat of chlorine doesn’t make up for the ills (or shit) it could have accumulated along the way. “The debate is less about the question of how harmful chlorine-washed chicken meat is and what that means for the consumer,” said Alessa Hartmann, of the Environment and Development Forum. “If the chlorine-washed meat is presented to the consumer as hygienic and clean, it’s a distraction from the catastrophic conditions under which the meat is produced.”
Strangely, this is a position shared by the Forum’s erstwhile target of rancor: the Central German Poultry Association has also publicly decried American meat processing methods. In a public statement, it defended its higher hygiene standards throughout the entire meat production process, and derided chlorine treatment as a tourniquet that masks an underlying lack of cleanliness.
The argument isn’t without credibility. Despite claims that chlorine treatments reduces the risk of bacterial contamination, the prevalence of salmonella in German chickens is lower than that of chickens slaughtered and sold in the U.S. (in 2013, Consumer Reports found 10.8 percent of U.S. chickens harbor salmonella bacteria, while the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment found 0.2 percent in its own country in 2011). Curiously, this might even be partially attributable to the disinfection process: immersion in chlorine baths has been associated with cross-contamination.
Some Germans think that the entire chlorine chicken brouhaha is just a distraction from more serious financing agreements being discussed during the TTIP negotiations. At the same time, it’s an issue that’s taken on a distinctly political flavor in the wake of a series of U.S.-German diplomatic disasters. In one satirical video (produced by CAMPACT, one of the activist hubs that organized last year’s march), taking a stance on chlorine chicken is likened to being a pesky, quixotic teenager.
The video, which has English subtitles, runs something like this:
Defiant teen: Chorinated chicken, again?!
Terrorizing, but ultimately triumphant, mother: The chickens have just been washed in chlorine. That’s how it is.
Teen: That’s totally sick!
Photo: German activist group CAMPACT at an earlier protest. Credit: REUTERS
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Jessica Camille Aguirre, Modern Farmer
August 11, 2014
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.