NASA Shows U.S. Corn Belt Literally Glowing with Productivity
In the height of the growing season, the Corn Belt lights up on NASA’s maps of photosynthetic activity like a Christmas tree.
Productivity is a tricky term here. Often, agricultural productivity describes how much food a farmer produces with a limited number of resources. The research, published on March 25 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, is instead concerned with “gross productivity” — in other words, the sheer amount of photosynthetic activity happening in a region.
To get a read on the metric, researchers led by Joanna Joiner of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center looked to the basics of photosynthesis. Chlorophyll in plants mainly absorbs light for conversion into energy, but the cell organs also emit a small portion of that light as a florescent glow invisible to the naked eye.
Joiner’s team realized they could measure that glow from existing satellite data. Research led by Luis Guanter at the Freie UniversitÁ¤t Berlin then used the data to estimate the photosynthesis from agriculture.
As you might expect, the tropics topped out productivity during most the year, but then there was the raging plant party known as Iowa in July. In the height of the growing season, the Corn Belt lit up NASA’s map at levels 40 times greater than those observed in the Amazon rain forest.
“The paper shows that fluorescence is a much better proxy for agricultural productivity than anything we’ve had before,” said Christian Frankenberg, a co-author of the paper at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in NASA’s press release. “This can go a long way regarding monitoring ”“ and maybe even predicting ”“ regional crop yields.”
As you might expect, the tropics topped out productivity during most the year, but then there was the raging plant party known as Iowa in July. In the height of the growing season, the Corn Belt lit up NASA’s map at levels 40 times greater than those observed in the Amazon rain forest.
Getting there probably will take a satellite designed in part for the purpose of measuring crop productivity.
For the their latest study, NASA relied on data from Metop-A, a European weather satellite. NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), scheduled for launch this coming July, would be able to measure plant florescence at a higher resolution than current orbiting instruments. NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive satellite, set for launch after OCO-2, would complement the effort.
From there, researchers could expand their analysis to landscapes of greater crop diversity than the central U.S. After all, not all places on the planet live on corn alone and different plants transmit different wave lengths of light. As the world tries to feed a hungrier population in a warmer world, productivity data from remote sensors in satellites could help inform both markets and policy.
But in the short term, the study from NASA might be of most interest to scientists studying global climate change. Joiner’s team found the Corn Belt to be 40 to 60 percent more productive than estimated in current climate models. Unlike wild plants, crops have frequent access to nutrients and irrigation, which has made it difficult for scientists to estimate their impact on the global carbon cycle in the past. The pink blotches in NASA’s imagery means U.S. crops are taking more greenhouses gases from the atmosphere than previously thought.
To be clear, that doesn’t mean corn farmers are secret warriors against climate change. Corn farmers might actually be the first to balk at the idea given the skepticism with which they view climate scientists. And agriculture — especially when reliant on nitrogen-based fertilizers — remains one of the key drivers of global climate change.
But, whether or not corn farmers trust them, climate scientists will need to acknowledge that the Corn Belt growers are pretty darn good at turning airborne carbon into solid vegetation.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].NASA Shows U.S. Corn Belt Literally Glowing with Productivity
by Sam Brasch, Modern Farmer
April 7, 2014
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
There seems to be a bit of confusion as to whether the corn belt in general grows all corn but doesn’t differentiate as to how much of the map is also growing wheat since the growing area encompasses areas of wheat and corn, and of course wheat is consumed by humans and “corn” is used as feed for farm animals
From the above article — “The Corn Belt lit up NASA’s map at levels 40 times greater than those observed in the Amazon rain forest.” The NASA press release linked to in the article itself says 40 PERCENT, not 40 times: “fluorescence from the Corn Belt, which extends from Ohio to Nebraska and Kansas, peaks in July at levels 40 percent greater than those observed in the Amazon.” That’s a rather HUGE ERROR in reporting.
“And agriculture — especially when reliant on nitrogen-based fertilizers — remains one of the key drivers of global climate change.” This is a false statement. The Sun is the key driver of climate change. Agriculture is statistically significant.