We Fought the Emus (and the Emus Won)
In October of 1932, two Australian soldiers went to war. Their enemy: rampaging bands of emus.
We Fought the Emus (and the Emus Won)
In October of 1932, two Australian soldiers went to war. Their enemy: rampaging bands of emus.
Emus, to be specific. After breeding season, Australia’s largest native bird migrated to the coast, but they were flightless, and noticed the road to Perth had been greatly improved.
The soldiers-turned-farmers disagreed. This aviary enemy was destroying valuable crops. Over 5,000 Australian and British veterans had set up farms in marginal areas of Western Australia after World War I, but the settlement program created its own kind of battlefield, and the tireless engagement hadn’t yielded much success. The Great Depression wasn’t helping matters, but the dawn of unemployment, deflation, poverty in 1929 also brought a significant promise from the government. Australia encouraged these farmers in Western Australia to increase wheat production in exchange for big subsidies. This came as the crop’s prices continued to plummet, but the subsidies never did. The only thing that arrived ahead of harvest were the emus.
Wheat prices continued to plummet, but the subsidies never did. The only thing that arrived ahead of harvest were the emus.
The region sent representatives to Canberra, the capital in the north, but they hardly bothered with the Department of Agriculture. They took their concerns to Sir George Pearce, the Minister of Defense. The 5-to-6 feet tall emus were not only eating their crops, they complained, but they created large gaps in the fences that surrounded the farms. The fences had originally been built to bar Australian’s most invasive species, the rabbit, from devouring the crops. (By 1859, two million rabbits were being shot or trapped each year, but the deaths had a negligent effect on the population.) The emus allowed thousands of rabbits to gain easy access to crops, rendering the animal ravaging near complete.
Sir Pearce agreed the problem would have to be dealt with, but money was tight. He would deploy the two soldiers under the command of Major G.P.W. Meredith of the Seventh Heavy Battery of the Royal Australian Artillery, and pay for their transport, but the farms would have to provide the military personnel with food, accommodation and those ten thousand rounds of ammunition. He also sent a Fox Movietone cinematographer along, recognizing an opportunity to show the rest of the country how hard the government was working to better the lives of all Australians during the Great Depression.
The soldiers had 1,000 emus in plain sight, but a gun jammed after killing twelve emus, while the rest went into hiding.
The trio arrived ready to decimate the interloping emus, but then the rain came, and the birds scattered. For a month, the military personnel waited in the homes of struggling farmers, who were obligated to share their scarce supplies. By the time the much needed rain ceased to fall on November 2, only 50 emus were spotted. An eager local population tried to help with an ambush, but the emus, which can run up to 40 miles per hour, once again scattered. Two days later, the soldiers had 1,000 emus in plain sight, but a gun jammed after killing twelve emus, while the rest went into hiding.
The emus seemed to quickly decipher the gun’s range, and the majority of birds escaped ensuing confrontations with their lives intact. The soldiers and locals tried a different tack. For days, they laid in wait, and when that proved unsuccessful, they descended in droves. They tried mounting the guns to trucks and rooftops with little success. Six days after the first emu fell, 2,500 rounds had been fired. Estimated death rates range from 50 to 500, a number which did not escape the local media. The negative attention reached the Australian House of Representatives who, on November 8, told the military personnel to withdrawal.
‘If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds, it would face any army in the world. They could face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks.’
“If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds, it would face any army in the world,” Major Meredith explained. “They could face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks. They are like Zulus, whom even dum dum bullets would not stop.”
The birds had won, and the violence had left them undeterred. They resumed their feast, their brazen pursuit of crops amplified by the unlucky combination of hot weather and drought. The farmers once again implored the government, and this time, James Mitchell, the Premier of Western Australia, supported their proposal.
There would be a second round. From November 13 to December 10, 1932, the emus were once again under attack, losing around 100 birds per week. In the end, Major Meredith claimed 9,860 rounds of ammunition had killed 986 emus. Another 2,500 had been badly injured, and would eventually succumb to their wounds.
Word of the Emu War, as it was being called in the papers, reached conservationists in Great Britain, who decried the extermination of a rare bird. By the time the military was accused of “mass destruction,” the government had had enough of the farmers of Western Australia and their problems, veterans or not. When they asked for additional assistance in 1934, 1943, and 1948, they were told machine guns were no longer an option. Bounty hunting, however, was perfectly acceptable – as was devouring the kill.
But in the end, no gun, machine or otherwise, scared away the emu — just simple scarcity. When the wheat was harvested, the emu moved on. Today, the birds are still considered a good dinner, and their oil, feathers, and leather a commodity.
Follow us
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].by Alexis Coe, Modern Farmer
April 21, 2014
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
SubmitNecessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and are used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.